Clinical Biomechanics

5.0k papers and 155.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.0k papers published in Clinical Biomechanics in the last decades have received a total of 155.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Biomechanics usually cover Surgery (2.7k papers), Biomedical Engineering (1.8k papers) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (1.4k papers) specifically the topics of Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (919 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (841 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (785 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Biomechanics are Stuart M. McGill, Alberto Leardini, Jacek Cholewicki, Nikolai Bogduk, Joseph Hamill, Fabio Catani, Jack P. Callaghan, Irene Davis, Christopher M. Powers and Irene S. Davis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Biomechanics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Biomechanics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Biomechanics.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Biomechanics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Biomechanics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Biomechanics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Biomechanics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025