Mary-Ann Carter

424 total citations
9 papers, 317 citations indexed

About

Mary-Ann Carter is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Pharmacy. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary-Ann Carter has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 317 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 2 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Pharmacy. Recurrent topics in Mary-Ann Carter's work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (5 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (2 papers) and School Health and Nursing Education (1 paper). Mary-Ann Carter is often cited by papers focused on Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (5 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (2 papers) and School Health and Nursing Education (1 paper). Mary-Ann Carter collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and Netherlands. Mary-Ann Carter's co-authors include Louise Signal, Janet Hoek, Richard Edwards, Anthony Maher, Angela D. Liese, Adrian J. Cameron, Lukar Thornton, Charlie Foster, Wilma Waterlander and David Crawford and has published in prestigious journals such as BMC Public Health, Public Health Nutrition and International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

In The Last Decade

Mary-Ann Carter

9 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary-Ann Carter New Zealand 7 248 56 53 32 32 9 317
Sandrine Raffin France 5 173 0.7× 99 1.8× 33 0.6× 22 0.7× 34 1.1× 10 262
Rachel Prowse Canada 11 280 1.1× 66 1.2× 31 0.6× 30 0.9× 15 0.5× 33 363
Yann Le Bodo France 8 220 0.9× 133 2.4× 64 1.2× 32 1.0× 40 1.3× 15 342
Ninya Maubach New Zealand 11 291 1.2× 51 0.9× 51 1.0× 30 0.9× 20 0.6× 15 475
Natassja Billich Australia 7 196 0.8× 57 1.0× 26 0.5× 14 0.4× 13 0.4× 14 267
Joanna E. Holsten United States 4 293 1.2× 74 1.3× 19 0.4× 47 1.5× 17 0.5× 6 386
Sofia Rincón‐Gallardo Patiño United States 11 251 1.0× 34 0.6× 58 1.1× 17 0.5× 11 0.3× 20 333
Jennifer Norman Australia 6 178 0.7× 33 0.6× 41 0.8× 56 1.8× 7 0.2× 26 269
Neha Rathi Australia 15 393 1.6× 141 2.5× 69 1.3× 71 2.2× 17 0.5× 29 540
Amy Meinen United States 13 430 1.7× 193 3.4× 30 0.6× 42 1.3× 41 1.3× 21 572

Countries citing papers authored by Mary-Ann Carter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary-Ann Carter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary-Ann Carter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary-Ann Carter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary-Ann Carter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary-Ann Carter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary-Ann Carter. The network helps show where Mary-Ann Carter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary-Ann Carter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary-Ann Carter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary-Ann Carter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary-Ann Carter. Mary-Ann Carter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Carter, Mary-Ann, Louise Signal, Richard Edwards, & Janet Hoek. (2018). Competing teammates: food in New Zealand sports settings. Health Promotion International. 34(4). 803–810. 6 indexed citations
2.
Chambers, Tim, et al.. (2017). Alcohol sponsorship of a summer of sport: a frequency analysis of alcohol marketing during major sports events on New Zealand television.. PubMed. 130(1448). 27–33. 11 indexed citations
3.
Wilson, Nick, et al.. (2013). A nutritional analysis of New Zealand military food rations at Gallipoli in 1915: likely contribution to scurvy and other nutrient deficiency disorders.. PubMed. 126(1373). 12–29. 11 indexed citations
4.
Thornton, Lukar, Adrian J. Cameron, Sarah A. McNaughton, et al.. (2013). Does the availability of snack foods in supermarkets vary internationally?. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 10(1). 56–56. 78 indexed citations
5.
Carter, Mary-Ann, Louise Signal, Richard Edwards, Janet Hoek, & Anthony Maher. (2013). Food, fizzy, and football: promoting unhealthy food and beverages through sport - a New Zealand case study. BMC Public Health. 13(1). 126–126. 40 indexed citations
6.
Nghiem, Nhung, Mary-Ann Carter, & Nick Wilson. (2012). Emergency food storage for organisations and citizens in New Zealand: results of optimisation modelling.. PubMed. 125(1367). 49–60. 1 indexed citations
7.
Carter, Mary-Ann, Richard Edwards, Louise Signal, & Janet Hoek. (2011). Availability and marketing of food and beverages to children through sports settings: a systematic review. Public Health Nutrition. 15(8). 1373–1379. 45 indexed citations
8.
Carter, Mary-Ann. (2004). Measuring the 'obesogenic' food environment in New Zealand primary schools. Health Promotion International. 19(1). 15–20. 110 indexed citations
9.
Carter, Mary-Ann. (1999). Measuring the impact of a school food programme on food sales in New Zealand. Health Promotion International. 14(4). 307–316. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026