Countries citing papers authored by Mary M. Somerville
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary M. Somerville's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary M. Somerville with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary M. Somerville more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary M. Somerville
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary M. Somerville. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary M. Somerville. The network helps show where Mary M. Somerville may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary M. Somerville
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary M. Somerville.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary M. Somerville based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mary M. Somerville. Mary M. Somerville is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hajrizi, Edmond, et al.. (2017). University for Business and Technology University Libraries and Knowledge Center: A concept paper. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).2 indexed citations
3.
Somerville, Mary M., et al.. (2015). New pathways in scholarly discovery: Understanding the next generation of researcher tools. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).6 indexed citations
Somerville, Mary M.. (2013). Summon web-scale discovery service implementation: An organizational readiness case study. Computers in libraries. 33(6). 22–26.2 indexed citations
Somerville, Mary M., et al.. (2012). Appreciative Inquiry: A Transformative Approach for Initiating Shared Leadership and Organizational Learning. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala. 38(38). 7–24.9 indexed citations
Howard, Zaana, et al.. (2009). From evidence to action: a shared leadership approach. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology).1 indexed citations
12.
Mirijamdotter, Anita & Mary M. Somerville. (2009). Collaborative Design. International Journal of Information Technologies and Systems Approach. 2(1). 48–69.12 indexed citations
13.
Howard, Zaana & Mary M. Somerville. (2008). Building knowledge capabilities: an organisational learning approach. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology).5 indexed citations
14.
Somerville, Mary M., et al.. (2008). Preparing a new generation of librarians to serve our communities. Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific). 17(2). 34–38.1 indexed citations
15.
Mirijamdotter, Anita, et al.. (2006). An interactive and iterative evaluation approach for creating collaborative learning environments. Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific). 9(2). 60–81.14 indexed citations
Somerville, Mary M., et al.. (2005). A User-Centered Content Architecture for an Academic Digital Research Portal. DigitalCommons - CalPoly (California State Polytechnic University). 2005(1). 1172–1177.7 indexed citations
18.
Mirijamdotter, Anita & Mary M. Somerville. (2005). Dynamic action inquiry : a systems approach for knowledge based organizational learning. Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific).9 indexed citations
19.
Somerville, Mary M., et al.. (2005). Life after the reference desk: Co-creating a digital age library. Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific). 7(1). 56–57.5 indexed citations
20.
Somerville, Mary M.. (1991). Toward Information Literacy--Innovative Perspectives for the 1990s.. Library trends. 39(3). 187–362.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.