Mary Kirk

535 citations
16 papers · 78 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Mary Kirk

12 papers receiving 75 citations

Peers

Mary Kirk
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 7
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 9
  • Gender Studies 11
  • Media Technology 9
  • Computer Science Applications 5
Replace Heather White with:
Heather White United States
Margaret M. Hinrichs United States
Richa Saxena United States
ER te Velde Netherlands
Lisa Morrison United Kingdom
Molly Johnson United States
Joyce Foresman-Capuzzi United States
Zhou Chen United States
Irina Savelieva Russia
Wilbur Townsend New Zealand
Mary Kirk relative to Heather White United States Heather White's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Heather White · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Kirk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Kirk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Kirk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Kirk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Kirk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Kirk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Kirk. The network helps show where Mary Kirk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Mary Kirk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary Kirk Line = papers co-authored together Mary Kirk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 202220
2 201012
3
Bridging the digital divide by co-creating a collaborative computer science classroom
200211
4 202211
5 20046
6 20085
7
Narrowing the digital divide: in search of a map to mend the gap
20044
8 20072
9 20072
10 20092
11 20241
12
Critical Issues Affecting Internet Instruction within the North Carolina Community College System.
20001
13 20051
14 20100
15 20210
16 20050

About Mary Kirk

Mary Kirk is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, Education and Communication, having authored 16 papers that have together received 78 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender and Technology in Education (4 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (3 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper), Media, Gender, and Advertising (1 paper) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (7 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (9 citations), Gender Studies (11 citations), Media Technology (9 citations) and Computer Science Applications (5 citations). Mary Kirk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Carol Zander, Karen Jenkins, Hannah Dahlen, Lynne L. Johnson, Virginia Schmied, Natalie S. McAndrew, Petra Brysiewicz, Rahel Naef, Ann M. Price and Sandra Eggenberger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Renal Care, Women and Birth, Journal of Homosexuality, Nursing in Critical Care and NWSA Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact