Mary J. Renfrew

169 papers receiving 8.3k citations

Hit Papers

Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-...20122026201620212014201220172014250500750

Peers

Mary J. Renfrew
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
  • Epidemiology 4.5k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 2.7k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2.6k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 2.6k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 2.2k
Replace Virginia Schmied with:
Virginia Schmied Australia
Suzanne Tough Canada
Catherine Law United Kingdom
Kelley S. Scanlon United States
Beverley Chalmers Canada
Julia Krasevec United States
Alícia Matijasevich Brazil
Giovanny Vinícius Araújo de França Brazil
Ruowei Li United States
Mari Jeeva Sankar India
Mary J. Renfrew relative to Virginia Schmied Australia Virginia Schmied's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Virginia Schmied · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary J. Renfrew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary J. Renfrew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary J. Renfrew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary J. Renfrew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary J. Renfrew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary J. Renfrew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary J. Renfrew. The network helps show where Mary J. Renfrew may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary J. Renfrew

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary J. Renfrew. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary J. Renfrew based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary J. Renfrew. Mary J. Renfrew is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2 21
3 12
4 81
5 29
6 17
7 10
8 77
9
Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babiesbreakdown →
392
10 19
11 37
12
Encouraging breastfeeding: financial incentives.
6
13 46
14 14
15
Working together.
1
16 10
17 104
18 89
19
A National Study of Labour and Birth in Water
1
20 180

About Mary J. Renfrew

Mary J. Renfrew is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Epidemiology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 175 papers that have together received 8.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (89 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (38 papers) and Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (30 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (2.2k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (2.6k citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (2.7k citations). Mary J. Renfrew has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Felicia McCormick, Alison McFadden, Angela Wade, Peter Howie, Alan S. McNeilly, Soo Downe, Therese Dowswell, Holly Powell Kennedy, Lisa Dyson and Sarah King. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026