Jane Taylor

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
39 papers, 925 citations indexed

About

Jane Taylor is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Taylor has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 925 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in General Health Professions, 9 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 7 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Jane Taylor's work include Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (6 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers) and Child and Adolescent Health (5 papers). Jane Taylor is often cited by papers focused on Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (6 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers) and Child and Adolescent Health (5 papers). Jane Taylor collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Arab Emirates and United Kingdom. Jane Taylor's co-authors include Lily O’Hara, Jonathan Graffy, Mary J. Renfrew, Angela Wade, Alison McFadden, Anna Gavine, Susan Crowther, Anne Marie Rennie, Emma Veitch and Stephen MacGillivray and has published in prestigious journals such as PEDIATRICS, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

In The Last Decade

Jane Taylor

37 papers receiving 873 citations

Hit Papers

Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy te... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Taylor Australia 12 514 351 322 251 179 39 925
Jill R. Demirci United States 19 602 1.2× 277 0.8× 289 0.9× 233 0.9× 254 1.4× 73 965
Wendy Brodribb Australia 22 721 1.4× 442 1.3× 423 1.3× 267 1.1× 255 1.4× 60 1.2k
Yvonne Bronner United States 16 631 1.2× 482 1.4× 484 1.5× 347 1.4× 115 0.6× 41 1.2k
Jane S. Grassley United States 15 321 0.6× 217 0.6× 235 0.7× 221 0.9× 109 0.6× 41 749
Rhona J. McInnes United Kingdom 19 759 1.5× 507 1.4× 522 1.6× 266 1.1× 269 1.5× 41 1.2k
Josefa L. Martinez‐Brockman United States 12 435 0.8× 247 0.7× 234 0.7× 222 0.9× 121 0.7× 30 752
Sharron S. Humenick United States 19 581 1.1× 357 1.0× 309 1.0× 112 0.4× 237 1.3× 40 962
Elaine Burns Australia 19 691 1.3× 386 1.1× 453 1.4× 224 0.9× 376 2.1× 65 1.3k
Jan Pratt Australia 8 598 1.2× 479 1.4× 324 1.0× 215 0.9× 481 2.7× 9 1.2k
Lynne Porter Lewallen United States 18 318 0.6× 198 0.6× 289 0.9× 219 0.9× 93 0.5× 42 802

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Taylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Taylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Taylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Taylor. The network helps show where Jane Taylor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Taylor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Taylor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Taylor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Taylor. Jane Taylor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Walsh, Anthony, et al.. (2024). Communicating about sexual activity and intimacy after a heart attack: a cross-sectional survey of Australian health professionals. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 23(5). 478–485.
2.
3.
Walsh, Anthony, et al.. (2023). Australian health professionals’ perspectives on discussing sexual activity and intimacy with people who have had a heart attack: a qualitative study. Australian Journal of Primary Health. 30(1). NULL–NULL. 1 indexed citations
4.
O’Hara, Lily & Jane Taylor. (2023). QATCHEPP: A quality assessment tool for critical health promotion practice. Frontiers in Public Health. 11. 1121932–1121932. 1 indexed citations
5.
Taylor, Jane, Anne Roiko, Sue Devine, et al.. (2023). Council of Academic Public Health Institutions Australasia, Public health education for a sustainable future ‘Call to Action’, 2021. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 47(2). 100042–100042. 2 indexed citations
6.
Taylor, Jane, et al.. (2020). Perspectives about the baby friendly hospital/health initiative in Australia: an online survey. International Breastfeeding Journal. 15(1). 23–23. 11 indexed citations
7.
Henderson, Amanda, et al.. (2018). The uptake and implementation of the Baby Friendly Health Initiative in Australia. Women and Birth. 32(3). e323–e333. 9 indexed citations
8.
Taylor, Jane, Rachel Cole, Mary Kynn, & John B. Lowe. (2018). Home away from home: Health and wellbeing benefits of men's sheds. Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 29(3). 236–242. 14 indexed citations
9.
McFadden, Alison, Anna Gavine, Mary J. Renfrew, et al.. (2017). Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017(2). 392 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Taylor, Jane, et al.. (2017). Finding new ways to practise critically: applying a critical reflection model with Australian health promotion practitioners. Reflective Practice. 18(5). 627–640. 6 indexed citations
11.
Barnes, Margaret, et al.. (2017). Legislation, policies and guidelines related to breastfeeding and the Baby Friendly Health Initiative in Australia: a document analysis. Australian Health Review. 42(1). 72–81. 10 indexed citations
12.
O’Hara, Lily, Jane Taylor, & Margaret Barnes. (2016). The invisibilization of health promotion in Australian public health initiatives. Health Promotion International. 33(1). daw051–daw051. 4 indexed citations
14.
Parkes, Jacqueline, et al.. (2014). Partners in projects: Preparing for public involvement in health and social care research. Health Policy. 117(3). 399–408. 25 indexed citations
15.
Taylor, Jane, et al.. (2012). How-to Guide: Improving Transitions from the Hospital to Home Health Care to Reduce Avoidable Rehospitalizations. 10 indexed citations
16.
Moen, Ron, et al.. (2009). TCAB: The 'How' and the 'What'. AJN American Journal of Nursing. 109(11). 5–17. 19 indexed citations
17.
Graffy, Jonathan & Jane Taylor. (2005). What Information, Advice, and Support Do Women Want With Breastfeeding?. Birth. 32(3). 179–186. 109 indexed citations
18.
Beake, Sarah, et al.. (2004). Evaluation of the use of health care assistants to support disadvantaged women breastfeeding in the community. Maternal and Child Nutrition. 1(1). 32–43. 14 indexed citations
19.
White, Anthony J., et al.. (2003). A service-academic partnership in primary care research: one practice's experience.. PubMed. 53(493). 645–9. 3 indexed citations
20.
Jackson, Kenneth W., et al.. (2001). A randomized controlled trial comparing oxytocin administration before and after placental delivery in the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 185(4). 873–877. 74 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026