Ngai Fen Cheung

19 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-...20142026201820222014250500750

Peers

Ngai Fen Cheung
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 941
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 818
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 306
  • General Health Professions 229
  • Clinical Psychology 222
Replace Laura Wick with:
Laura Wick Palestinian Territory
Maria Helena Bastos Brazil
Mary Anne Biró Australia
Margaret Flood Australia
Donna Hartz Australia
Jocelyn Toohill Australia
Vicky Nogueira Pileggi Brazil
Kirstie Coxon United Kingdom
Zoe Bradfield Australia
Paula Laws Australia
Ngai Fen Cheung relative to Laura Wick Palestinian Territory Laura Wick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Laura Wick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ngai Fen Cheung

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ngai Fen Cheung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ngai Fen Cheung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ngai Fen Cheung more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ngai Fen Cheung

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ngai Fen Cheung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ngai Fen Cheung. The network helps show where Ngai Fen Cheung may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ngai Fen Cheung

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ngai Fen Cheung. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ngai Fen Cheung based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ngai Fen Cheung. Ngai Fen Cheung is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 19
2 2
3
Midwifery in China
2
4 46
5
Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn carebreakdown →
885
6 10
7 25
8 8
9 16
10 10
11 10
12 27
13 6
14 23
15 46
16 28
17 72
18
Diet therapy in the postnatal period from a Chinese perspective. Part 2.
1
19
Pain in normal labor.
3
20
Incontinence sheaths: when are they necessary?
1

About Ngai Fen Cheung

Ngai Fen Cheung is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research and Theory and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (12 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (8 papers) and Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (941 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (818 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (156 citations). Ngai Fen Cheung has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Malawi. Frequent co-authors include Address Malata, Felicia McCormick, Mary J. Renfrew, Andrew Amos Channon, Eugene Declercq, Holly Powell Kennedy, Maria Helena Bastos, Alison McFadden, Laura Wick and Soo Downe. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, International Journal of Nursing Studies and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026