Mary Hook
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects top 1%
- Health Information Management top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Catherine H. IvoryAnn O’BrienCharlotte A. WeaverMary K. MuthSusan MatneyPatricia C. DykesHolly MillerMarcelline R. Harris
- Topics
- Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (7 papers)Electronic Health Records Systems (5 papers)Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Advanced NursingJournal of the American Medical Informatics AssociationJournal of Nursing Scholarship
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaIsrael
In The Last Decade
Mary Hook
22 papers receiving 285 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- General Health Professions 152
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 76
- Health Information Management 68
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 66
- Clinical Psychology 30
Countries citing papers authored by Mary Hook
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Hook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Hook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Hook more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Hook
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Hook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Hook. The network helps show where Mary Hook may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Hook
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Hook. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Hook based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Hook. Mary Hook is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 104 | |
| 17 | Fall-related injuries in acute care: reducing the risk of harm. | 7 |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Mary Hook
Mary Hook is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Health Information Management and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 26 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (7 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (5 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (76 citations), Health Information Management (68 citations) and Research and Theory (13 citations). Mary Hook has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Catherine H. Ivory, Ann O’Brien, Charlotte A. Weaver, Mary K. Muth, Susan Matney, Patricia C. Dykes, Holly Miller, Marcelline R. Harris, Norma M. Lang and Elizabeth C. Devine. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association and Journal of Nursing Scholarship.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.