Barbara King

5.2k citations
60 papers · 2.1k indexed · h-index 19

Barbara King

56 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Barbara King
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 132
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 291
  • Research and Theory 32
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 173
  • Infectious Diseases 615
Replace Anne‐Marie Boström with:
Anne‐Marie Boström Sweden
Rhonda Griffiths Australia
Jurgis Karuza United States
Sonia Hines Australia
Ellen Schell United States
Cláudia Benedita dos Santos Brazil
Véronique Boscart Canada
Maciek Godycki-Ćwirko Poland
Bodil Wilde‐Larsson Sweden
Rafat Islam Canada
Barbara King relative to Anne‐Marie Boström Sweden Anne‐Marie Boström's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.0×
Anne‐Marie Boström · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Barbara King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara King. The network helps show where Barbara King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Barbara King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Barbara King Line = papers co-authored together Barbara King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20234
3 20236
4 20224
5 20225
6 20228
7 20215
8 202013
9 201817
10 201721
11 201676
12 20163
13 20141
14 201368
15 2012136
16 201159
17 20076
18 2003151
19 1995192
20 1994440

About Barbara King

Barbara King is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 60 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (17 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (10 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (8 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (7 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (5 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (132 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (291 citations), Research and Theory (32 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (173 citations) and Infectious Diseases (615 citations). Barbara King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Barbara J. Bowers, Stephen E. Weis, Lloyd Mancl, Peter Milgrom, Philip C. Slocum, Francis X. Blais, Enriqueta Gómez, Tonya Roberts, Philip R. Weinstein and Kristen E. Pecanac. Their work appears in journals such as The Gerontologist, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Journal of Nursing Scholarship, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine and American Journal of Physical Anthropology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026