Catherine H. Ivory
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Health Information Management top 2%
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Co-authors
- Susan M. SmithCharlotte A. WeaverAnn O’BrienMary HookYou ChenSarah S. OsmundsonAbel KhoHolly Powell Kennedy
- Topics
- Electronic Health Records Systems (8 papers)Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (7 papers)Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics AssociationInternational Journal of Medical InformaticsJournal of Biomedical Informatics
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaIndia
In The Last Decade
Catherine H. Ivory
21 papers receiving 232 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- General Health Professions 113
- Health Information Management 64
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 50
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 50
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 47
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine H. Ivory
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine H. Ivory's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine H. Ivory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine H. Ivory more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine H. Ivory
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine H. Ivory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine H. Ivory. The network helps show where Catherine H. Ivory may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine H. Ivory
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine H. Ivory. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine H. Ivory based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine H. Ivory. Catherine H. Ivory is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 61 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Catherine H. Ivory
Catherine H. Ivory is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Health Information Management and Leadership and Management, having authored 24 papers that have together received 257 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (8 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (7 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (50 citations), Research and Theory (24 citations) and Health Information Management (64 citations). Catherine H. Ivory has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and India. Frequent co-authors include Susan M. Smith, Charlotte A. Weaver, Ann O’Brien, Mary Hook, You Chen, Sarah S. Osmundson, Abel Kho, Holly Powell Kennedy, Carol Sakala and Neel Shah. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, International Journal of Medical Informatics and Journal of Biomedical Informatics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.