Mary Anne Casey
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Pharmacy top 5%
- Co-authors
- Cheryl L. PerryMary StoryDianne Neumark‐SztainerRichard A. KruegerJonathan DonnerLisa M. BrosseauAnn L. Fredrickson
- Topics
- Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior (1 paper)Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper)Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change (1 paper)
- Journals
- Frontiers in MicrobiologyIndustrial HealthJournal of the American Dietetic Association
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mary Anne Casey
4 papers receiving 702 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 492
- Clinical Psychology 245
- General Health Professions 167
- Nutrition and Dietetics 92
- Pharmacy 80
Countries citing papers authored by Mary Anne Casey
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Anne Casey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Anne Casey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Anne Casey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Anne Casey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Anne Casey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Anne Casey. The network helps show where Mary Anne Casey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Anne Casey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Anne Casey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Anne Casey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Anne Casey. Mary Anne Casey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 110 | |
| 3 | Factors Influencing Food Choices of Adolescentsbreakdown → | 640 |
| 4 | Program planning processes used by Minnesota Extension Service agriculture agents | 1 |
About Mary Anne Casey
Mary Anne Casey is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 4 papers that have together received 756 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior (1 paper), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper) and Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (492 citations), Pharmacy (80 citations) and Applied Psychology (78 citations). Mary Anne Casey has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Cheryl L. Perry, Mary Story, Dianne Neumark‐Sztainer, Richard A. Krueger, Jonathan Donner, Lisa M. Brosseau and Ann L. Fredrickson. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Microbiology, Industrial Health and Journal of the American Dietetic Association.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.