Mark W. Frazier
- Molecular Biology
- Oncology top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Biotechnology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Gerard P. ZambettiUte M. MollAnne G. OstermeyerZhengming GuXiaoping HeJinling WangJohn L. ClevelandBrian McStay
- Topics
- China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (8 papers)Urban Planning and Governance (4 papers)Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers)
- Journals
- Genes & DevelopmentContemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsMolecular and Cellular Biology
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Mark W. Frazier
28 papers receiving 903 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Molecular Biology 463
- Oncology 339
- Political Science and International Relations 238
- Sociology and Political Science 178
- Biotechnology 93
Countries citing papers authored by Mark W. Frazier
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark W. Frazier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark W. Frazier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark W. Frazier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark W. Frazier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark W. Frazier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark W. Frazier. The network helps show where Mark W. Frazier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark W. Frazier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark W. Frazier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark W. Frazier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark W. Frazier. Mark W. Frazier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Emergence of a New Hanseatic League: How Special Economic Zones Will Reshape Global Governance | 2 |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 156 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 50 | |
| 13 | 167 | |
| 14 | 243 | |
| 15 | Acute and delayed apoptosis induced by thymidine deprivation correlates with expression of p53 and p53-regulated genes in colon carcinoma cells. | 25 |
| 16 | 75 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 36 | |
| 19 | 24 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Mark W. Frazier
Mark W. Frazier is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Political Science and International Relations and Biotechnology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 976 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (8 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (4 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (339 citations), Biotechnology (93 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (238 citations). Mark W. Frazier has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Gerard P. Zambetti, Ute M. Moll, Anne G. Ostermeyer, Zhengming Gu, Xiaoping He, Jinling Wang, John L. Cleveland, Brian McStay, R H Reeder and Morris L. Bian. Their work appears in journals such as Genes & Development, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Molecular and Cellular Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.