Margaret M. Pearson
- Political Science and International Relations top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Development top 0.5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Kellee S. TsaiDavid S. G. GoodmanMeg RithmireCiqi MeiScott L. KastnerDylan SutherlandAndrea BolthoMark W. Frazier
- Topics
- China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (13 papers)International Development and Aid (11 papers)International Relations and Foreign Policy (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Margaret M. Pearson
40 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Political Science and International Relations 618
- Sociology and Political Science 385
- Strategy and Management 307
- Development 209
- Economics and Econometrics 159
Countries citing papers authored by Margaret M. Pearson
This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret M. Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret M. Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret M. Pearson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret M. Pearson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret M. Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret M. Pearson. The network helps show where Margaret M. Pearson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret M. Pearson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret M. Pearson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret M. Pearson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret M. Pearson. Margaret M. Pearson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 26 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 38 | |
| 6 | 63 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 156 | |
| 11 | Lead, Follow, Reform, or Spoil? China in Multilateral Governance | 1 |
| 12 | Regulating decentralized state industries: China's auto industry | 5 |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 54 | |
| 15 | 131 | |
| 16 | China's emerging business class: Democracy's Harbinger? | 5 |
| 17 | 97 | |
| 18 | 73 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Margaret M. Pearson
Margaret M. Pearson is a scholar working on Development, Political Science and International Relations and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (13 papers), International Development and Aid (11 papers) and International Relations and Foreign Policy (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (209 citations), Political Science and International Relations (618 citations) and Strategy and Management (307 citations). Margaret M. Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Kellee S. Tsai, David S. G. Goodman, Meg Rithmire, Ciqi Mei, Scott L. Kastner, Dylan Sutherland, Andrea Boltho, Mark W. Frazier, Doug Guthrie and Morris L. Bian. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Human Molecular Genetics and World Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.