Mark van Roojen
Impact in
- Philosophy top 1%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- War, Ethics, and Justification
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Free Will and Agency
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Papers in
- Philosophy 10
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 9
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 5
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 1
-
- Free Will and Agency 6
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 5
- Co-authors
- Michael SloteMark TimmonsMarcia BaronPhilip PettitTyler CowenDavid SchmidtzJames DreierThomas Hurka
- Journals
- The Philosophical Quarterly (4 papers)The Philosophical Review (3 papers)Philosophical Studies (2 papers)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2 papers)Ethics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark van Roojen
21 papers receiving 285 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Philosophy 209
- Cognitive Neuroscience 161
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 65
- History and Philosophy of Science 14
- General Decision Sciences 4
Countries citing papers authored by Mark van Roojen
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark van Roojen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark van Roojen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark van Roojen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark van Roojen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark van Roojen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark van Roojen. The network helps show where Mark van Roojen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Mark van Roojen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 2 | Metaethics: A Contemporary Introduction | 2015 | 12 |
| 3 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 6 | Moral Cognitivism vs. Non-Cognitivism | 2004 | 46 |
| 7 | 2004 | 48 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 29 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 53 | |
| 13 | 2000 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 9 | |
| 15 | Affirmative Action, Non-Consequentialism, and Responsibility for the Effects of Past Discrimination | 1997 | 3 |
| 16 | 1996 | 5 | |
| 17 | 1996 | 43 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 8 | |
| 19 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1995 | 5 |
About Mark van Roojen
Mark van Roojen is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (9 papers), Free Will and Agency (6 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (1 paper) and Economic Theory and Institutions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (209 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (161 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (65 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (14 citations) and General Decision Sciences (4 citations). Mark van Roojen has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Slote, Mark Timmons, Marcia Baron, Philip Pettit, Tyler Cowen, David Schmidtz, James Dreier, Thomas Hurka, Michael E Weber and Christine Swanton. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, The Philosophical Review, Philosophical Studies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.