James Dreier

2.3k total citations
19 papers, 681 citations indexed

About

James Dreier is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, James Dreier has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 681 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Philosophy, 8 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 2 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in James Dreier's work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (7 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers). James Dreier is often cited by papers focused on Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (7 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers). James Dreier collaborates with scholars based in United States. James Dreier's co-authors include Tyler Cowen, Christine Swanton, David Schmidtz, Jan Narveson, Thomas Hurka, Henry S. Richardson, Mark van Roojen, Michael Byron, Michael Slote and Michael E Weber and has published in prestigious journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Noûs and Ethics.

In The Last Decade

James Dreier

18 papers receiving 564 citations

Peers

James Dreier
Selim Berker United States
Clayton Littlejohn United Kingdom
Brian Hedden Australia
Elijah Millgram United States
Mark Lance United States
Mark van Roojen United States
Selim Berker United States
James Dreier
Citations per year, relative to James Dreier James Dreier (= 1×) peers Selim Berker

Countries citing papers authored by James Dreier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Dreier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Dreier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Dreier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Dreier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Dreier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Dreier. The network helps show where James Dreier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Dreier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Dreier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Dreier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Dreier. James Dreier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Dreier, James. (2009). RELATIVISM (AND EXPRESSIVISM) AND THE PROBLEM OF DISAGREEMENT. Philosophical Perspectives. 23(1). 79–110. 48 indexed citations
2.
Dreier, James. (2007). Moral Relativism and Moral Nihilism. Oxford University Press eBooks. 10 indexed citations
3.
Byron, Michael, Michael Slote, David Schmidtz, et al.. (2004). Satisficing and Maximizing. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 48 indexed citations
4.
Dreier, James. (2004). Lockean and logical truth conditions. Analysis. 64(281). 84–91. 5 indexed citations
5.
Dreier, James. (2004). Meta‐Ethics and The Problem of Creeping Minimalism. Philosophical Perspectives. 18(1). 23–44. 131 indexed citations
6.
Dreier, James. (2002). META‐ETHICS AND NORMATIVE COMMITMENT. Philosophical Issues. 12(1). 241–263. 13 indexed citations
7.
Dreier, James. (2002). The Expressivist Circle: Invoking Norms in the Explanation of Normative Judgment. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 65(1). 136–143. 4 indexed citations
8.
Dreier, James. (2002). Meta–Ethics and Normative Commitment. Noûs. 36(s1). 241–263. 4 indexed citations
9.
Dreier, James. (2002). Critical Study: Timmons, Mark Morality without Foundations: A Defense of Moral Contextualism. Noûs. 36(1). 152–168. 3 indexed citations
10.
Dreier, James. (2000). Dispositions and Fetishes: Externalist Models of Moral Motivation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 61(3). 619–619. 35 indexed citations
11.
Dreier, James. (1999). Transforming Expressivism. Noûs. 33(4). 558–572. 20 indexed citations
12.
Dreier, James. (1996). Expressivist embeddings and minimalist truth. Philosophical Studies. 83(1). 29–51. 39 indexed citations
13.
Dreier, James. (1996). Rational preference: Decision theory as a theory of practical rationality. Theory and Decision. 40(3). 249–276. 48 indexed citations
14.
Dreier, James. (1996). Book Reviews. Mind. 105(418). 363–367. 4 indexed citations
15.
Dreier, James. (1996). Accepting agent centred norms: A problem for non-cognitivists and a suggestion for solving it. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 74(3). 409–422. 11 indexed citations
16.
Dreier, James & James E. Tomberlin. (1994). Perspectives on the Normativity of Ethics. Noûs. 28(4). 514–514. 1 indexed citations
17.
Dreier, James. (1993). Structures of Normative Theories. The Monist. 76(1). 22–40. 81 indexed citations
18.
Dreier, James. (1992). THE SUPERVENIENCE ARGUMENT AGAINST MORAL REALISM. The Southern Journal of Philosophy. 30(3). 13–38. 37 indexed citations
19.
Dreier, James. (1990). Internalism and Speaker Relativism. Ethics. 101(1). 6–26. 139 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026