Mark Tomforde

1.6k citations
31 papers · 511 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Tomforde

30 papers receiving 467 citations

Peers

Mark Tomforde
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Algebra and Number Theory 402
  • Mathematical Physics 456
  • Geometry and Topology 177
  • Applied Mathematics 74
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 76
Replace C. P. Hughes with:
C. P. Hughes United Kingdom
Judith Packer United States
Ken Dykema United States
Siegfried Echterhoff Germany
Yasuo Watatani Japan
Camillo Trapanı Italy
Simon Wassermann United Kingdom
Anton Deitmar Germany
Jay Jorgenson United States
Theodore Voronov United Kingdom
Mark Tomforde relative to C. P. Hughes United Kingdom C. P. Hughes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
C. P. Hughes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Tomforde

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Tomforde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Tomforde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Tomforde more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Tomforde

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Tomforde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Tomforde. The network helps show where Mark Tomforde may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Mark Tomforde, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Tomforde Line = papers co-authored together Mark Tomforde links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200766
2 200545
3 201140
4 201138
5 200936
6 201434
7 201332
8 200828
9 200426
10 200520
11 200319
12 200216
13 200415
14 202113
15 200813
16 200911
17 201310
18 20109
19 20088
20 20146

About Mark Tomforde

Mark Tomforde is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Algebra and Number Theory, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Geometry and Topology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 511 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Operator Algebra Research (28 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (26 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (10 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (9 papers), Advanced Banach Space Theory (3 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (2 papers), Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods (2 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Logic (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (402 citations), Mathematical Physics (456 citations), Geometry and Topology (177 citations), Applied Mathematics (74 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (76 citations). Mark Tomforde has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Vern I. Paulsen, Paul S. Muhly, Aidan Sims, Gene Abrams, Ivan G. Todorov, Ali S. Kavruk, Efren Ruiz, Bernhard G. Bodmann, Lisa Orloff Clark and Takeshi Katsura. Their work appears in journals such as Indiana University Mathematics Journal, Journal of Functional Analysis, Algebras and Representation Theory, Journal of Algebra and Advances in Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact