Algebras and Representation Theory

1.2k papers and 7.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Algebras and Representation Theory in the last decades have received a total of 7.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Algebras and Representation Theory usually cover Geometry and Topology (1.1k papers), Algebra and Number Theory (960 papers) and Mathematical Physics (503 papers) specifically the topics of Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (1.0k papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (831 papers) and Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (252 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Algebras and Representation Theory are Yunhe Sheng, Tomasz Brzeziński, Pere Ara, Enrique Pardo, Sonia Natale, Osamu Iyama, Julien Bichon, Xiao‐Wu Chen, Amnon Yekutieli and Sarah Witherspoon.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Algebras and Representation Theory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Algebras and Representation Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Algebras and Representation Theory.

Countries where authors publish in Algebras and Representation Theory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Algebras and Representation Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Algebras and Representation Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Algebras and Representation Theory more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025