Mark Toher

636 total citations
14 papers, 73 citations indexed

About

Mark Toher is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Toher has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 73 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Anthropology, 4 papers in Archeology and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Mark Toher's work include Classical Antiquity Studies (7 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (2 papers). Mark Toher is often cited by papers focused on Classical Antiquity Studies (7 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (2 papers). Mark Toher collaborates with scholars based in United States. Mark Toher's co-authors include Michael A. Flower, Ian D. Morris, George Cawkwell, Alain M. Gowing, S. J. V. Malloch, Miriam Griffin, S. P. Oakley, D. S. Levene, Alexandra Gajda and Christopher B. Krebs and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Historical Review, The Classical Quarterly and Classical Antiquity.

In The Last Decade

Mark Toher

10 papers receiving 38 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mark Toher United States	5	48	35	11	9	9	14	73
Elizabeth Keitel United States	5	50 1.0×	23 0.7×	8 0.7×	15 1.7×	8 0.9×	11	64
S. J. V. Malloch United Kingdom	5	42 0.9×	21 0.6×	8 0.7×	10 1.1×	7 0.8×	13	57
Walter Eder United States	4	50 1.0×	29 0.8×	5 0.5×	7 0.8×	9 1.0×	10	67
Rhiannon Ash United Kingdom	5	50 1.0×	20 0.6×	13 1.2×	20 2.2×	7 0.8×	15	71
Daniel L. Selden United States	4	39 0.8×	22 0.6×	10 0.9×	7 0.8×	8 0.9×	11	56
Francesca Santoro L’hoir	4	45 0.9×	23 0.7×	7 0.6×	11 1.2×	4 0.4×	5	67
Josiah Osgood United States	5	68 1.4×	29 0.8×	11 1.0×	12 1.3×	12 1.3×	14	99
Ellen O’Gorman United Kingdom	6	82 1.7×	45 1.3×	14 1.3×	14 1.6×	7 0.8×	16	105
Martin Hose Germany	5	49 1.0×	30 0.9×	7 0.6×	9 1.0×	5 0.6×	27	63
James Ker United States	5	41 0.9×	19 0.5×	22 2.0×	9 1.0×	8 0.9×	10	75

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Toher

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Toher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Toher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Toher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Toher

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Toher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Toher. The network helps show where Mark Toher may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Toher

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Toher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Toher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Toher. Mark Toher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

1.

Toher, Mark. (2012). The Exitus of Augustus. Hermes. 140(1). 37–44. 2 indexed citations

2.

Toher, Mark. (2011). Herod's Last Days. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. 106(106). 209–228.

3.

Woodman, A. J., Alain M. Gowing, A. R. Birley, et al.. (2010). The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 25 indexed citations

4.

Toher, Mark. (2005). Tillius and Horace. The Classical Quarterly. 55(1). 183–189.

5.

Toher, Mark. (2004). Octavian’s arrival in Rome, 44 b.c.. The Classical Quarterly. 54(1). 174–184.

6.

Toher, Mark. (2003). Nicolaus and Herod in the "Antiquitates Judaicae". Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. 101. 427–427. 4 indexed citations

7.

Toher, Mark. (2002). NEPOS' SECOND EDITION. Philologus. 146(1). 139–149. 2 indexed citations

8.

Toher, Mark. (2001). Euripides' supplices and the social function of funeral ritual. Hermes. 129(3). 332–343. 4 indexed citations

9.

Toher, Mark. (2001). Diodoros on Delion and Euripides’ Supplices. The Classical Quarterly. 51(1). 178–182. 1 indexed citations

10.

Toher, Mark, et al.. (1997). Actium and Augustus: The Politics and Emotions of Civil War.. The American Historical Review. 102(4). 1134–1134. 5 indexed citations

11.

Toher, Mark & Ian D. Morris. (1994). Death-Ritual and Social Structure in Classical Antiquity.. The American Historical Review. 99(5). 1666–1666. 8 indexed citations

12.

Cawkwell, George, Michael A. Flower, & Mark Toher. (1991). Georgica : Greek studies in honour of George Cawkwell. 13 indexed citations

13.

Toher, Mark. (1991). GREEK FUNERARY LEGISLATION AND THE TWO SPARTAN FUNERALS. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. 37(Supplement_58). 159–175. 3 indexed citations

14.

Toher, Mark. (1989). On the Use of Nicolaus' Historical Fragments. Classical Antiquity. 8(1). 159–172. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact