Josiah Osgood

1.3k total citations
14 papers, 99 citations indexed

About

Josiah Osgood is a scholar working on Anthropology, Philosophy and Archeology. According to data from OpenAlex, Josiah Osgood has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 99 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Anthropology, 2 papers in Philosophy and 2 papers in Archeology. Recurrent topics in Josiah Osgood's work include Classical Antiquity Studies (8 papers), Historical and Architectural Studies (2 papers) and Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers). Josiah Osgood is often cited by papers focused on Classical Antiquity Studies (8 papers), Historical and Architectural Studies (2 papers) and Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers). Josiah Osgood collaborates with scholars based in United States. Josiah Osgood's co-authors include S. P. Oakley, Brent D. Shaw, Harriet I. Flower, Kathryn Lomas, Karl–Joachim Hölkeskamp, Saskia Hin, Ann Kuttner, Phyllis Culham, Jörg Rüpke and John F. Lazenby and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Historical Review, The American Journal of Philology and The Classical Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Josiah Osgood

13 papers receiving 62 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Josiah Osgood United States	5	68	29	25	12	12	14	99
Adam M. Kemezis Canada	5	63 0.9×	32 1.1×	16 0.6×	19 1.6×	11 0.9×	15	76
David Meban Canada	3	86 1.3×	44 1.5×	19 0.8×	12 1.0×	9 0.8×	4	105
Henriette van der Blom United Kingdom	6	80 1.2×	24 0.8×	16 0.6×	17 1.4×	16 1.3×	12	101
Ellen O’Gorman United Kingdom	6	82 1.2×	45 1.6×	16 0.6×	14 1.2×	7 0.6×	16	105
Andreola Rossi United States	7	91 1.3×	47 1.6×	17 0.7×	23 1.9×	9 0.8×	12	111
Christopher B. Krebs United States	6	68 1.0×	38 1.3×	11 0.4×	16 1.3×	11 0.9×	18	96
Mark Toher United States	5	48 0.7×	35 1.2×	8 0.3×	9 0.8×	9 0.8×	14	73
S. J. V. Malloch United Kingdom	5	42 0.6×	21 0.7×	9 0.4×	10 0.8×	7 0.6×	13	57
Brian W. Breed United States	6	64 0.9×	25 0.9×	10 0.4×	9 0.8×	6 0.5×	13	80
Lukas de Blois Netherlands	5	52 0.8×	44 1.5×	32 1.3×	6 0.5×	5 0.4×	24	91

Countries citing papers authored by Josiah Osgood

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Josiah Osgood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Josiah Osgood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Josiah Osgood more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Josiah Osgood

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Josiah Osgood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Josiah Osgood. The network helps show where Josiah Osgood may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Josiah Osgood

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Josiah Osgood. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Josiah Osgood based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Josiah Osgood. Josiah Osgood is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

1.

Osgood, Josiah, et al.. (2020). How to Be a Bad Emperor: An Ancient Guide to Truly Terrible Leaders. 1 indexed citations

2.

Osgood, Josiah, et al.. (2019). Cassius Dio and the Late Roman Republic. 3 indexed citations

3.

Osgood, Josiah. (2018). Rome and the Making of a World State, 150 BCE–20 CE. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations

4.

Osgood, Josiah. (2015). Ending Civil War at Rome: Rhetoric and Reality, 88 b.c.e.–197 c.e.. The American Historical Review. 120(5). 1683–1695. 2 indexed citations

5.

Osgood, Josiah. (2014). Turia: A Roman Woman's Civil War. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 13 indexed citations

6.

Flower, Harriet I., Jean‐Jacques Aubert, S. P. Oakley, et al.. (2014). The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic. Cambridge University Press eBooks.

7.

Osgood, Josiah. (2010). Caesar and The Pirates: or How to Make (and Break) an Ancient Life. Greece and Rome. 57(2). 319–336. 4 indexed citations

8.

Osgood, Josiah. (2009). The Pen and the Sword: Writing and Conquest in Caesar's Gaul. Classical Antiquity. 28(2). 328–358. 9 indexed citations

9.

Osgood, Josiah. (2008). CAESAR AND NICOMEDES. The Classical Quarterly. 58(2). 687–691. 2 indexed citations

10.

Osgood, Josiah. (2007). The Vox and Verba of an Emperor: Claudius, Seneca and "Le Prince Ideal". The Classical Journal. 102(4). 329–354. 6 indexed citations

11.

Osgood, Josiah. (2006). Caesar's Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 49 indexed citations

12.

Osgood, Josiah. (2006). Eloquence under the Triumvirs. The American Journal of Philology. 127(4). 525–551. 6 indexed citations

13.

Osgood, Josiah. (2006). Nuptiae Iure Civili Congruae: Apuleius's Story of Cupid and Psyche and the Roman Law of Marriage. Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-). 136(2). 415–441. 2 indexed citations

14.

Osgood, Josiah. (2005). Cicero’s Pro Caelio 33–34 and Appius Claudius’ Oratio de Pyrrho. Classical Philology. 100(4). 355–358. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact