Mark Thompson‐Fawcett
- Surgery top 5%
- Oncology top 10%
- Genetics top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- N J McC MortensenBryan F. WarrenTim WilkinsonRobin S. McLeodMark RedstonVictoria MarcusTony EganChristopher Frampton
- Topics
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (11 papers)Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (7 papers)Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaGastroenterologyClinical Cancer Research
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark Thompson‐Fawcett
45 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Surgery 626
- Oncology 350
- Genetics 260
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 210
- Epidemiology 169
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Thompson‐Fawcett
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Thompson‐Fawcett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Thompson‐Fawcett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Thompson‐Fawcett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Thompson‐Fawcett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Thompson‐Fawcett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Thompson‐Fawcett. The network helps show where Mark Thompson‐Fawcett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Thompson‐Fawcett
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Thompson‐Fawcett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Thompson‐Fawcett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Thompson‐Fawcett. Mark Thompson‐Fawcett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | A confidence and safety approach to multiple-choice question scoring | 3 |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 45 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 109 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | 105 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 77 | |
| 16 | 69 | |
| 17 | 66 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 67 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Mark Thompson‐Fawcett
Mark Thompson‐Fawcett is a scholar working on Family Practice, Gastroenterology and Surgery, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (11 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (7 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (91 citations), Gastroenterology (95 citations) and Surgery (626 citations). Mark Thompson‐Fawcett has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include N J McC Mortensen, Bryan F. Warren, Tim Wilkinson, Robin S. McLeod, Mark Redston, Victoria Marcus, Tony Egan, Christopher Frampton, Z. Cohen and Zane Cohen. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Gastroenterology and Clinical Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.