Mark Schafer

1.6k citations
39 papers · 746 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Schafer

36 papers receiving 634 citations

Peers

Mark Schafer
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Political Science and International Relations 355
  • Development 39
  • Sociology and Political Science 447
  • General Psychology 10
  • Social Psychology 88
Replace Ryan K. Beasley with:
Ryan K. Beasley United Kingdom
Mathew Y. H. Wong Hong Kong
Marcos Ancelovici Canada
Sumanta Banerjee
James Igoe Walsh United States
Tor Georg Jakobsen Norway
Kerem Ozan Kalkan United States
Angelika Rettberg Colombia
Kurt Schock United States
Peadar Kirby Ireland
Mark Schafer relative to Ryan K. Beasley United Kingdom Ryan K. Beasley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ryan K. Beasley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Schafer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Schafer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Schafer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Schafer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Schafer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Schafer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Schafer. The network helps show where Mark Schafer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Mark Schafer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Schafer Line = papers co-authored together Mark Schafer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998103
2 200064
3 199858
4 200657
5 200954
6 199937
7 200835
8 200834
9 201131
10 200030
11 200229
12 199728
13 199627
14 200025
15 202119
16 201615
17 199914
18 200713
19 202210
20 20109

About Mark Schafer

Mark Schafer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Safety Research, having authored 39 papers that have together received 746 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Relations and Foreign Policy (11 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (5 papers), Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research (5 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (4 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers), Conflict Management and Negotiation (2 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (355 citations), Development (39 citations), Sociology and Political Science (447 citations), General Psychology (10 citations) and Social Psychology (88 citations). Mark Schafer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and India. Frequent co-authors include Stephen G. Walker, Michael D. Young, Krishna P. Paudel, Akan Malici, David M. J. S. Bowman, Yoshinori Kamo, Joachim Singelmann, Bill Clinton, Dan‐Bright S. Dzorgbo and Ashley Perry. Their work appears in journals such as Political Psychology, International Studies Quarterly, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Foreign Policy Analysis and International Interactions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact