Foreign Policy Analysis

556 papers and 7.8k indexed citations

About

The 556 papers published in Foreign Policy Analysis in the last decades have received a total of 7.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Foreign Policy Analysis usually cover Political Science and International Relations (408 papers), Sociology and Political Science (337 papers) and Development (126 papers) specifically the topics of International Relations and Foreign Policy (271 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (177 papers) and International Development and Aid (126 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Foreign Policy Analysis are Valerie M. Hudson, Jelena Subotić, Cameron G. Thies, Dursun Peksen, Stephen Benedict Dyson, Sarah Kreps, Juliet Kaarbo, Susan Hannah Allen, David Patrick Houghton and Bryan R. Early.

In The Last Decade

Foreign Policy Analysis

507 papers receiving 7.0k citations

Countries where authors publish in Foreign Policy Analysis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Foreign Policy Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Foreign Policy Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Foreign Policy Analysis more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Foreign Policy Analysis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Foreign Policy Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Foreign Policy Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026