Mark S. Chapell

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 961 citations indexed

About

Mark S. Chapell is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark S. Chapell has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 961 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Mark S. Chapell's work include Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (2 papers) and Impact of Light on Environment and Health (2 papers). Mark S. Chapell is often cited by papers focused on Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (2 papers) and Impact of Light on Environment and Health (2 papers). Mark S. Chapell collaborates with scholars based in United States. Mark S. Chapell's co-authors include Masami Takahashi, Aaron A. Gubi, Willis F. Overton, Jennifer Ferrell, Barbara Sullivan, Ellen B. Basso, M.P. Batten and William A. Beltran and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Psychological Reports and Journal of Black Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Mark S. Chapell

16 papers receiving 840 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Test Anxiety and Academic Performance in Undergraduate and Graduate Students.

2005 593 citations Mark S. Chapell, Masami Takahashi et al. Journal of Educational Psychology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mark S. Chapell United States	9	458	323	276	272	165	17	961
Bernd G. Heubeck Australia	15	321 0.7×	423 1.3×	203 0.7×	255 0.9×	108 0.7×	28	938
Lay See Yeo Singapore	17	304 0.7×	558 1.7×	440 1.6×	221 0.8×	166 1.0×	32	1.0k
Diana Wright Guerin United States	19	404 0.9×	486 1.5×	456 1.7×	323 1.2×	126 0.8×	35	1.2k
Angela F. Y. Siu Hong Kong	15	358 0.8×	466 1.4×	325 1.2×	166 0.6×	94 0.6×	41	970
María Cristina Richaud Argentina	20	505 1.1×	616 1.9×	456 1.7×	203 0.7×	173 1.0×	114	1.3k
Laura Francesca Scalas Italy	15	571 1.2×	235 0.7×	287 1.0×	450 1.7×	159 1.0×	37	1.1k
Geneviève Taylor Canada	15	506 1.1×	406 1.3×	260 0.9×	346 1.3×	97 0.6×	34	1.0k
Hongfei Yang China	16	328 0.7×	497 1.5×	392 1.4×	298 1.1×	156 0.9×	38	1.0k
Natasha K. Segool United States	14	328 0.7×	450 1.4×	435 1.6×	283 1.0×	67 0.4×	23	1.0k
Susan P. Antaramian United States	12	701 1.5×	609 1.9×	376 1.4×	253 0.9×	161 1.0×	14	1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark S. Chapell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark S. Chapell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark S. Chapell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark S. Chapell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark S. Chapell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark S. Chapell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark S. Chapell. The network helps show where Mark S. Chapell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark S. Chapell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark S. Chapell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark S. Chapell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark S. Chapell. Mark S. Chapell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Chapell, Mark S., et al.. (2006). Bullying in elementary school, high school, and college.. PubMed. 41(164). 633–48. 136 indexed citations

Chapell, Mark S., et al.. (2005). Test Anxiety and Academic Performance in Undergraduate and Graduate Students.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 97(2). 268–274. 593 indexed citations breakdown →

Chapell, Mark S., et al.. (2004). Bullying in college by students and teachers.. PubMed. 39(153). 53–64. 106 indexed citations

Chapell, Mark S. & Willis F. Overton. (2002). Development of Logical Reasoning and the School Performance of African American Adolescents in Relation to Socioeconomic Status, Ethnic Identity, and Self-Esteem. Journal of Black Psychology. 28(4). 295–317. 36 indexed citations

Chapell, Mark S., et al.. (2002). Frequency of Public Laughter in Relation to Sex, Age, Ethnicity, and Social Context. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 95(3). 746–746. 9 indexed citations

Chapell, Mark S.. (2001). MYOPIA AND NIGHT-TIME LIGHTING DURING SLEEP IN CHILDREN AND ADULTS. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 92(3). 640–640. 3 indexed citations

Chapell, Mark S., et al.. (2001). Myopia and Night-Time Lighting during Sleep in Children and Adults. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 92(3). 640–642E. 16 indexed citations

Chapell, Mark S., et al.. (1999). Men and Women Holding Hands: II. Whose Hand is Uppermost?. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 89(2). 537–549. 4 indexed citations

Chapell, Mark S.. (1999). MEN AND WOMEN HOLDING HANDS: II. WHOSE HAND IS UPPERMOST?. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 89(6). 537–537. 1 indexed citations

10.

Chapell, Mark S. & Willis F. Overton. (1998). Development of Logical Reasoning in the Context of Parental Style and Test Anxiety.. Merrill-palmer Quarterly. 44(2). 16 indexed citations

11.

Chapell, Mark S. & Masami Takahashi. (1998). Differences in Worldviews of Japanese and Americans in Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Cohorts. Psychological Reports. 83(2). 659–665. 2 indexed citations

12.

Chapell, Mark S.. (1998). DIFFERENCES IN WORLDVIEWS OF JAPANESE AND AMERICANS IN YOUNG, MIDDLE-AGED, AND OLDER COHORTS. Psychological Reports. 83(6). 659–659. 1 indexed citations

13.

Chapell, Mark S., et al.. (1998). Men and Women Holding Hands: Whose Hand is Uppermost?. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 87(1). 127–130. 8 indexed citations

14.

Chapell, Mark S.. (1997). Frequency of Public Smiling across the Life Span. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 85(3_suppl). 1326–1326. 16 indexed citations

15.

Chapell, Mark S.. (1996). Brief report: Changing perspectives on aging and intelligence: An empirical update. Journal of Adult Development. 3(4). 233–239. 4 indexed citations

16.

Chapell, Mark S.. (1994). Inner Speech and Respiration: Toward a Possible Mechanism of Stress Reduction. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 79(2). 803–811. 7 indexed citations

17.

Chapell, Mark S.. (1990). Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (Crib Death) and Possible Relation to Long-Term Mattress Compression. Psychological Reports. 67(3_suppl). 1267–1272. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact