Mark Radford

1.2k total citations
26 papers, 732 citations indexed

About

Mark Radford is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Radford has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 732 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Social Psychology, 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 6 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Mark Radford's work include Cultural Differences and Values (9 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers). Mark Radford is often cited by papers focused on Cultural Differences and Values (9 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers). Mark Radford collaborates with scholars based in Japan, Australia and United States. Mark Radford's co-authors include Leon Mann, Taiki Takahashi, Yasuyuki Ohta, Yoshibumi Nakane, Paul C. Burnett, Steve Ford, Ross Kalucy, Kuo‐Shu Yang, Graham M. Vaughan and Kwok Leung and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Schizophrenia Bulletin and The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease.

In The Last Decade

Mark Radford

25 papers receiving 667 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Radford Japan 14 226 185 142 140 130 26 732
Michael E. Enzle Canada 17 376 1.7× 153 0.8× 216 1.5× 293 2.1× 186 1.4× 46 1.1k
Robert K. Gifford United States 10 240 1.1× 117 0.6× 153 1.1× 327 2.3× 84 0.6× 24 762
Scott F. Madey United States 11 245 1.1× 188 1.0× 93 0.7× 261 1.9× 94 0.7× 22 842
Corinne Auman United States 8 253 1.1× 110 0.6× 42 0.3× 226 1.6× 147 1.1× 8 840
Noelle Nelson United States 6 290 1.3× 169 0.9× 108 0.8× 234 1.7× 209 1.6× 8 1.1k
Timothy Buckley United States 6 84 0.4× 162 0.9× 73 0.5× 115 0.8× 39 0.3× 6 533
N. Will Shead Canada 15 240 1.1× 124 0.7× 569 4.0× 336 2.4× 92 0.7× 27 1.0k
Bernardo J. Carducci United States 12 156 0.7× 70 0.4× 119 0.8× 88 0.6× 96 0.7× 31 519
Douglas J. Lisle United States 5 174 0.8× 168 0.9× 53 0.4× 168 1.2× 114 0.9× 6 676
Janet Landman United States 12 350 1.5× 419 2.3× 270 1.9× 327 2.3× 122 0.9× 19 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Radford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Radford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Radford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Radford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Radford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Radford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Radford. The network helps show where Mark Radford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Radford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Radford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Radford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Radford. Mark Radford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Smith, Justine R., Janet L. Davis, Joke H. de Boer, et al.. (2022). The International Vitreoretinal B-Cell Lymphoma Registry: a protocol paper. BMJ Open. 12(7). e060701–e060701. 2 indexed citations
2.
Klein, Helen Altman, Mei‐Hua Lin, Mark Radford, et al.. (2009). Cultural Differences in Cognition: Rosetta Phase I. Psychological Reports. 105(2). 659–674. 9 indexed citations
3.
Takahashi, Taiki, et al.. (2009). Relationship between personality scales of impulsiveness and discounting of monetary gains and losses in smokers and never smokers. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 3(3). 59–72. 1 indexed citations
4.
Masuda, Takahiko, et al.. (2008). Effect of contextual factors on patterns of eye-movement: Comparing sensitivity to background information between Japanese and Westerners. The Japanese journal of psychology. 79(1). 35–43. 9 indexed citations
5.
Radford, Mark, Toshio Yamagishi, & Susumu Ohnuma. (2007). Cultural and Ecological Foundations of the Mind: Mutual Construction of the Mind and Society. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 5(10). e008344–e008344. 3 indexed citations
6.
Takahashi, Taiki, et al.. (2007). Comparison of probabilistic choice models in humans. Behavioral and Brain Functions. 3(1). 20–20. 19 indexed citations
7.
Takahashi, Taiki, et al.. (2007). Empirical estimation of consistency parameter in intertemporal choice based on Tsallis’ statistics. Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 381. 338–342. 45 indexed citations
8.
Takahashi, Taiki, et al.. (2005). Cortisol levels and prospective and retrospective memory in humans.. PubMed. 26(5). 599–602. 13 indexed citations
9.
Radford, Mark. (2004). Transcultural Issues in Mood and Anxiety Disorders: A Focus on Japan. CNS Spectrums. 9(S4). 6–13. 14 indexed citations
10.
Mann, Leon, Mark Radford, Paul C. Burnett, et al.. (1998). Cross‐cultural Differences in Self‐reported Decision‐making Style and Confidence. International Journal of Psychology. 33(5). 325–335. 167 indexed citations
11.
Nakane, Y., Yasuyuki Ohta, & Mark Radford. (1992). Epidemiological Studies of Schizophrenia in Japan. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 18(1). 75–84. 24 indexed citations
13.
Radford, Mark. (1991). Cultural Influences on Depression: A New Methodological Approach and Its Results. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 45(3). 545–564. 2 indexed citations
14.
Radford, Mark, Yoshibumi Nakane, Yasuyuki Ohta, Leon Mann, & Ross Kalucy. (1991). Decision Making in Clinically Depressed Patients. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 179(12). 711–719. 18 indexed citations
15.
Radford, Mark, Leon Mann, Yasuyuki Ohta, & Yoshibumi Nakane. (1991). Differences Between Australian and Japanese Students in Reported Use of Decision Processes. International Journal of Psychology. 26(1). 35–52. 30 indexed citations
16.
Radford, Mark, Yoshibumi Nakane, Yasuyuki Ohta, Leon Mann, & Ross Kalucy. (1989). A Study of Depression in Two Cultures: A Transcultural Study with Japanese and Australian Clinically Depressed Patients. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 43(2). 119–132. 9 indexed citations
17.
Radford, Mark, Leon Mann, Yasuyuki Ohta, & Y. Nakane. (1989). INDIVIDUAL DECISION MAKING BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY. THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. 28(2). 115–122. 3 indexed citations
18.
Radford, Mark, Leon Mann, & Ross Kalucy. (1986). Psychiatric Disturbance and Decisionmaking. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 20(2). 210–217. 52 indexed citations
19.
Mann, Leon, Mark Radford, & Chie Kanagawa. (1985). Cross-cultural differences in children's use of decision rules: A comparison between Japan and Australia.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 49(6). 1557–1564. 2 indexed citations
20.
Mann, Leon, Mark Radford, & Chie Kanagawa. (1985). Cross-cultural differences in children's use of decision rules: A comparison between Japan and Australia.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 49(6). 1557–1564. 53 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026