Scott F. Madey
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- General Decision Sciences top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Thomas GilovichVictoria Husted MedvecRowena GomezAlison L. ChasteenJennifer WheelerDavid Dunning
- Topics
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers)Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (5 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyPersonality and Individual DifferencesThe Journals of Gerontology Series B
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Scott F. Madey
22 papers receiving 772 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Sociology and Political Science 261
- Social Psychology 245
- Applied Psychology 190
- General Decision Sciences 188
- Cognitive Neuroscience 157
Countries citing papers authored by Scott F. Madey
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott F. Madey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott F. Madey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott F. Madey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott F. Madey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott F. Madey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott F. Madey. The network helps show where Scott F. Madey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott F. Madey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott F. Madey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott F. Madey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott F. Madey. Scott F. Madey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 30 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 49 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 38 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 273 | |
| 17 | 44 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Scott F. Madey
Scott F. Madey is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 842 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (5 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (188 citations), Applied Psychology (190 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (28 citations). Scott F. Madey has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Gilovich, Victoria Husted Medvec, Rowena Gomez, Alison L. Chasteen, Jennifer Wheeler and David Dunning. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences and The Journals of Gerontology Series B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.