Mark R. Hoffarth

1.5k total citations
19 papers, 573 citations indexed

About

Mark R. Hoffarth is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark R. Hoffarth has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 573 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 13 papers in Social Psychology and 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Mark R. Hoffarth's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (13 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (7 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers). Mark R. Hoffarth is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (13 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (7 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers). Mark R. Hoffarth collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Russia. Mark R. Hoffarth's co-authors include Gordon Hodson, Becky L. Choma, John T. Jost, Malvina N. Skorska, Anthony F. Bogaert, Danielle S. Molnar, Vivienne Badaan, Ray Blanchard, José Antonio Gabrie and Doug P. VanderLaan and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Mark R. Hoffarth

19 papers receiving 553 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark R. Hoffarth Canada 15 383 281 114 73 67 19 573
Charlotte Witt United States 15 230 0.6× 82 0.3× 41 0.4× 55 0.8× 4 0.1× 32 560
Andrew Edward White United States 10 290 0.8× 249 0.9× 83 0.7× 129 1.8× 15 0.2× 14 721
James O. Young Canada 13 217 0.6× 158 0.6× 19 0.2× 72 1.0× 3 0.0× 75 789
Lesley Newson United States 10 471 1.2× 200 0.7× 124 1.1× 65 0.9× 8 0.1× 18 745
Sabahat Çiğdem Bağci Türkiye 18 586 1.5× 363 1.3× 73 0.6× 84 1.2× 29 0.4× 47 789
M. Elizabeth Barnes United States 16 390 1.0× 405 1.4× 45 0.4× 7 0.1× 18 0.3× 40 780
Claudia Castañeda United States 9 169 0.4× 68 0.2× 75 0.7× 11 0.2× 13 0.2× 12 400
Zachary H. Garfield United States 11 231 0.6× 128 0.5× 22 0.2× 38 0.5× 17 0.3× 21 359
Vivienne Badaan United States 12 587 1.5× 332 1.2× 71 0.6× 86 1.2× 20 0.3× 16 719
Mildred Dickemann United States 6 261 0.7× 78 0.3× 159 1.4× 13 0.2× 16 0.2× 13 455

Countries citing papers authored by Mark R. Hoffarth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark R. Hoffarth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark R. Hoffarth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark R. Hoffarth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark R. Hoffarth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark R. Hoffarth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark R. Hoffarth. The network helps show where Mark R. Hoffarth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark R. Hoffarth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark R. Hoffarth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark R. Hoffarth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark R. Hoffarth. Mark R. Hoffarth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Hoffarth, Mark R., et al.. (2023). Heterosexist system justification: Identity and ideology explain variability in sexual minorities’ opposition to homophobia and support for LGBTQ+ rights. Journal of Social and Political Psychology. 11(2). 708–729. 3 indexed citations
2.
Badaan, Vivienne, et al.. (2023). Ideological asymmetries in online hostility, intimidation, obscenity, and prejudice. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 22345–22345. 5 indexed citations
3.
Earle, Megan, et al.. (2020). A multilevel analysis of LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender) rights support across 77 countries: The role of contact and country laws. British Journal of Social Psychology. 60(3). 851–869. 32 indexed citations
4.
Hoffarth, Mark R., Flávio Azevedo, & John T. Jost. (2019). Political conservatism and the exploitation of nonhuman animals: An application of system justification theory. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 22(6). 858–878. 19 indexed citations
5.
Choma, Becky L., et al.. (2019). Right‐Wing Ideology as a Predictor of Collective Action: A Test Across Four Political Issue Domains. Political Psychology. 41(2). 303–322. 45 indexed citations
6.
Jost, John T., et al.. (2018). The future of system justification theory. British Journal of Social Psychology. 58(2). 382–392. 45 indexed citations
7.
Hoffarth, Mark R. & Gordon Hodson. (2018). When intergroup contact is uncommon and bias is strong: the case of anti-transgender bias. Psychology and Sexuality. 9(3). 237–250. 43 indexed citations
8.
Skorska, Malvina N., Gordon Hodson, & Mark R. Hoffarth. (2018). Experimental effects of degrading versus erotic pornography exposure in men on reactions toward women (objectification, sexism, discrimination). The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality. 27(3). 261–276. 14 indexed citations
9.
Hoffarth, Mark R., Gordon Hodson, & Danielle S. Molnar. (2017). When and why is religious attendance associated with antigay bias and gay rights opposition? A justification-suppression model approach.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 115(3). 526–563. 29 indexed citations
10.
Hoffarth, Mark R. & Anthony F. Bogaert. (2017). Opening the closet door: Openness to experience, masculinity, religiosity, and coming out among same-sex attracted men. Personality and Individual Differences. 109. 215–219. 6 indexed citations
11.
Bogaert, Anthony F., Malvina N. Skorska, Chao Wang, et al.. (2017). Male homosexuality and maternal immune responsivity to the Y-linked protein NLGN4Y. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115(2). 302–306. 78 indexed citations
12.
Choma, Becky L., Reeshma Haji, Gordon Hodson, & Mark R. Hoffarth. (2016). Avoiding cultural contamination: Intergroup disgust sensitivity and religious identification as predictors of interfaith threat, faith-based policies, and islamophobia. Personality and Individual Differences. 95. 50–55. 22 indexed citations
13.
Hoffarth, Mark R. & Gordon Hodson. (2015). Green on the outside, red on the inside: Perceived environmentalist threat as a factor explaining political polarization of climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 45. 40–49. 112 indexed citations
14.
Hoffarth, Mark R., et al.. (2015). Development and validation of the Attitudes Towards Asexuals (ATA) scale. Psychology and Sexuality. 7(2). 88–100. 27 indexed citations
15.
Adachi, Paul J. C., Gordon Hodson, & Mark R. Hoffarth. (2015). Video game play and intergroup relations: Real world implications for prejudice and discrimination. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 25. 227–236. 17 indexed citations
16.
Hoffarth, Mark R. & Gordon Hodson. (2015). Who Needs Imagined Contact?. Social Psychology. 47(2). 118–124. 22 indexed citations
17.
Choma, Becky L., et al.. (2014). Reasoning Ability and Ideology. Journal of Individual Differences. 35(3). 177–183. 9 indexed citations
18.
Hodson, Gordon, Nour Kteily, & Mark R. Hoffarth. (2014). Of filthy pigs and subhuman mongrels: Dehumanization, disgust, and intergroup prejudice. 21(3). 267–284. 27 indexed citations
19.
Hoffarth, Mark R. & Gordon Hodson. (2014). Is subjective ambivalence toward gays a modern form of bias?. Personality and Individual Differences. 69. 75–80. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026