Mark M. Gray

1.1k citations
18 papers · 682 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Mark M. Gray

16 papers receiving 576 citations

Peers

Mark M. Gray
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Political Science and International Relations 352
  • Gender Studies 134
  • Communication 76
  • Development 34
  • Sociology and Political Science 348
Replace Irwin L. Morris with:
Irwin L. Morris United States
Emily Beaulieu United States
Patricio Navia Chile
Zohal Hessami Germany
Irfan Nooruddin United States
Ebonya Washington United States
Matthew Singer United States
Thomas Kurer Switzerland
Ian Holliday Hong Kong
Esteban F. Klor Israel
Mark M. Gray relative to Irwin L. Morris United States Irwin L. Morris's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Irwin L. Morris · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark M. Gray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark M. Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark M. Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark M. Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark M. Gray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark M. Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark M. Gray. The network helps show where Mark M. Gray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Mark M. Gray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark M. Gray Line = papers co-authored together Mark M. Gray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2000252
2 2003164
3 2006150
4 200637
5 201325
6 200612
7 201712
8 200710
9 20108
10
Feeling Left Out by the Left? Left Party Economic Performance and Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective, 1950 to 2000
20052
11 20082
12
The War on Terror, U.S. Military Assistance, and Human Rights
20112
13 20052
14 20122
15 20241
16 20161
17 20250
18 20170

About Mark M. Gray

Mark M. Gray is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Education, Strategy and Management and History, having authored 18 papers that have together received 682 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (6 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Catholicism and Religious Studies (2 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers) and Religious Education and Schools (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (352 citations), Gender Studies (134 citations), Communication (76 citations), Development (34 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (348 citations). Mark M. Gray has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Wayne Sandholtz, Miki Caul Kittilson, Wayne Sandholtz, Paul M. Perl, Elizabeth A. Oldmixon, Brian Calfano, Charles E. Zech, Mary L. Gautier, Jason E. Hurley and John D. Downie. Their work appears in journals such as International Organization, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Presidential Studies Quarterly, PS Political Science & Politics and English Language and Linguistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact