Mark Findlay

1.2k total citations
104 papers, 609 citations indexed

About

Mark Findlay is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Law and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Findlay has authored 104 papers receiving a total of 609 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 31 papers in Law and 26 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Mark Findlay's work include International Law and Human Rights (14 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (13 papers) and Criminal Law and Evidence (13 papers). Mark Findlay is often cited by papers focused on International Law and Human Rights (14 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (13 papers) and Criminal Law and Evidence (13 papers). Mark Findlay collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Singapore and United Kingdom. Mark Findlay's co-authors include Russell Hogg, Ralph Henham, Peter Duff, Jeffrey S. Sutton, David Indermaur, Chris Cunneen, Andrew Stewart, Robert Green, Don Weatherburn and Jenni Millbank and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The British Journal of Criminology and Administration & Society.

In The Last Decade

Mark Findlay

90 papers receiving 495 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Findlay Australia 13 400 198 123 65 41 104 609
William J. Stuntz United States 12 393 1.0× 178 0.9× 199 1.6× 34 0.5× 65 1.6× 38 641
Chris Greer United Kingdom 12 369 0.9× 124 0.6× 56 0.5× 34 0.5× 70 1.7× 23 513
Máximo Sozzo Argentina 11 493 1.2× 107 0.5× 63 0.5× 167 2.6× 48 1.2× 65 617
Ben Bowling United Kingdom 15 644 1.6× 414 2.1× 57 0.5× 57 0.9× 93 2.3× 36 823
Harold E. Pepinsky United States 12 479 1.2× 131 0.7× 54 0.4× 119 1.8× 82 2.0× 33 580
Ian Loader United Kingdom 10 483 1.2× 199 1.0× 27 0.2× 51 0.8× 61 1.5× 23 584
Frank E. Hagan United States 9 330 0.8× 62 0.3× 39 0.3× 55 0.8× 54 1.3× 12 435
Anne T. Gallagher United States 12 461 1.2× 174 0.9× 45 0.4× 24 0.4× 59 1.4× 29 539
Yvon Dandurand Canada 10 303 0.8× 90 0.5× 82 0.7× 15 0.2× 77 1.9× 25 419
Mirko Bagaric Australia 10 258 0.6× 96 0.5× 96 0.8× 14 0.2× 98 2.4× 150 553

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Findlay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Findlay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Findlay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Findlay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Findlay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Findlay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Findlay. The network helps show where Mark Findlay may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Findlay

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Findlay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Findlay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Findlay. Mark Findlay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zhang, Wenxi, et al.. (2023). Trust and robotics: a multi-staged decision-making approach to robots in community. AI & Society. 39(5). 2463–2478. 1 indexed citations
2.
Findlay, Mark, et al.. (2022). Digitised Justice: The New Two Tiers?. Criminal Law Forum. 33(1). 1–38.
3.
Findlay, Mark. (2012). Book Review: Travels of the Criminal Question: Cultural Embeddedness and Diffusion by Dario Melossi, Maximo Sozzo & Richard Sparks, Eds.. SSRN Electronic Journal.
4.
Findlay, Mark, et al.. (2010). The messy reality of organised crime research. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1.
5.
Findlay, Mark. (2010). The Challenge for Asian Jurisdictions in the Development of International Criminal Justice. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations
6.
Findlay, Mark. (2010). The Challenges for Asian Jurisdictions in the Development of International Criminal Justice. Institutional Knowledge (InK) - Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University (Singapore Management University). 32(2). 205. 2 indexed citations
7.
Findlay, Mark, et al.. (2010). Conversations with a crime boss: Doing Asian criminal business. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1.
8.
Findlay, Mark & Ralph Henham. (2005). Transforming international criminal justice: retributive and restorative justice in the trial process. Institutional Knowledge (InK) - Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University (Singapore Management University). 16 indexed citations
9.
Findlay, Mark, et al.. (2003). Integrating theory and methodology in the comparative contextual analysis of trial process. Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository).
10.
Findlay, Mark, et al.. (2003). SOF on the Contemporary Battlefield. Military review. 83(3). 8. 2 indexed citations
11.
Findlay, Mark, et al.. (2001). Theory and methodology in the comparative contextual analysis of trial process. Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository). 4 indexed citations
12.
Findlay, Mark. (2001). Juror Comprehension and Complexity. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
13.
Findlay, Mark. (1995). International Rights and Australian Adaptations: Recent Developments in Criminal Investigation. Institutional Knowledge (InK) - Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University (Singapore Management University). 5 indexed citations
14.
Findlay, Mark, et al.. (1993). Alternative policing styles : cross-cultural perspectives. Institutional Knowledge (InK) - Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University (Singapore Management University). 37 indexed citations
15.
Findlay, Mark, et al.. (1991). Legal systems of the PRC. Institutional Knowledge (InK) - Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University (Singapore Management University). 1 indexed citations
16.
Findlay, Mark, et al.. (1991). Constitutional Rights and the Constraint on Populist Dissent: Recent Resort to Legalism in China. Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University). 19(1). 67. 1 indexed citations
17.
Findlay, Mark. (1991). Corruption Control and Monstering. Current Issues in Criminal Justice. 2(3). 36–48. 2 indexed citations
18.
Findlay, Mark. (1988). Institutional Responses to Corruption: Some Critical Reflections on the ICAC. Institutional Knowledge (InK) - Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University (Singapore Management University). 12. 271. 1 indexed citations
19.
Findlay, Mark & Russell Hogg. (1988). Understanding Crime and Criminal Justice. Institutional Knowledge (InK) - Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University (Singapore Management University). 49 indexed citations
20.
Findlay, Mark, et al.. (1984). Changes to Parole in New South Wales. Institutional Knowledge (InK) - Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University (Singapore Management University). 8(3). 132. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026