William J. Stuntz
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Law top 0.5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Topics
- Criminal Law and Evidence (18 papers)Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (9 papers)Law, Rights, and Freedoms (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William J. Stuntz
34 papers receiving 527 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Sociology and Political Science 393
- Law 199
- Political Science and International Relations 178
- Economics and Econometrics 172
- Clinical Psychology 65
Countries citing papers authored by William J. Stuntz
This map shows the geographic impact of William J. Stuntz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William J. Stuntz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William J. Stuntz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William J. Stuntz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William J. Stuntz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William J. Stuntz. The network helps show where William J. Stuntz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William J. Stuntz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William J. Stuntz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William J. Stuntz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William J. Stuntz. William J. Stuntz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | Terry's Impossibility | 2 |
| 3 | 122 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Christianity and the (Modest) Rule of Law | 2 |
| 6 | The Political Constitution of Criminal Justice | 15 |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | Al Capone's Revenge: An Essay on the Political Economy of Pretextual Prosecution | 11 |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | Terrorism, Federalism, and Police Misconduct | 3 |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 43 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | Remedies and Incentives in Private and Public Law: A Comparative Essay | 0 |
About William J. Stuntz
William J. Stuntz is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 641 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Law and Evidence (18 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (9 papers) and Law, Rights, and Freedoms (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (199 citations), Sociology and Political Science (393 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (178 citations). William J. Stuntz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert E. Scott, David A. Skeel, Michael W. McConnell, John C. Jeffries and Saul Levmore. Their work appears in journals such as The Yale Law Journal, Harvard Law Review and Stanford Law Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.