Mirko Bagaric
About
In The Last Decade
Mirko Bagaric
115 papers receiving 463 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Sociology and Political Science 258
- Clinical Psychology 98
- Political Science and International Relations 96
- Law 96
- Accounting 89
Countries citing papers authored by Mirko Bagaric
This map shows the geographic impact of Mirko Bagaric's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mirko Bagaric with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mirko Bagaric more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mirko Bagaric
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mirko Bagaric. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mirko Bagaric. The network helps show where Mirko Bagaric may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mirko Bagaric
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mirko Bagaric. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mirko Bagaric based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mirko Bagaric. Mirko Bagaric is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Solution to the Pervasive Bias and Discrimination in the Criminal Justice: Transparent Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| 2 | PRISON ABOLITION: FROM NAÏVE IDEALISM TO TECHNOLOGICAL PRAGMATISM | 4 |
| 3 | Decarcerating America: The Opportunistic Overlap Between Theory and (Mainly State) Sentencing Practice as a Pathway to Meaningful Reform | 1 |
| 4 | Erasing the bias against using artificial intelligence to predict future criminality: Algorithms are color blind and never tire | 5 |
| 5 | Trauma and Sentencing: The Case for Mitigating Penalty for Childhood Physical and Sexual Abuse | 2 |
| 6 | The Fallacy of Punishing Offenders for the Deeds of Others: An Argument for Abolishing Offence Prevalence as a Sentencing Aggravating Consideration | 0 |
| 7 | A Rational Theory of Mitigation and Aggravation in Sentencing: Why Less is More When It Comes to Punishing Criminals | 4 |
| 8 | Rich Offender, Poor Offender: Why It (Sometimes) Matters in Sentencing | 4 |
| 9 | A Rational Approach To Sentencing White- Collar Offenders in Australia | 3 |
| 10 | In search of coherent jurisprudence for international criminal law : correlating universal human responsibilities with universal human rights | 1 |
| 11 | Towards best practice in corporate governance | 0 |
| 12 | If we can't have global democracy, let's all be Americans : injecting principle into the international lawmaking process | 1 |
| 13 | Fat and the law: who should take the blame? | 5 |
| 14 | Disloyality and divorce: why (and when) the traitor should pay | 1 |
| 15 | The Indigenous art market: a roadmap to a more equitable and efficient system | 2 |
| 16 | Why wrongful birth actions are right. | 3 |
| 17 | The moral status of wrongful life claims. | 5 |
| 18 | What sort of mandatory penalties should we have | 1 |
| 19 | Imprisonment for driving while disqualified: disproportionate punishment or sound public policy? | 1 |
| 20 | Suspended Sentences and Preventive Sentence: Illusory Evils and Disproportionate Punishments | 9 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.