This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Duff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Duff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Duff more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Duff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Duff. The network helps show where Peter Duff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Duff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Duff.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Duff based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Duff. Peter Duff is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Chalmers, James, et al.. (2014). Post-Corroboration Safeguards Review: Report of the Academic Expert Group. Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee).5 indexed citations
3.
Duff, Peter. (2012). The Requirement for Corroboration in Scottish Criminal Cases: One Argument against Retention. 513–525.2 indexed citations
Chalmers, James, Peter Duff, & Fiona Leverick. (2007). Victim impact statements: can work, do work (for those who bother to make them). ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).16 indexed citations
6.
Brown, Kevin J., Peter Duff, & Fiona Leverick. (2004). Offending on Bail: An Analysis of the Use and the Impact of Aggravated Sentences for Bail Offenders. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
7.
Tata, Cyrus, et al.. (2004). Does mode of delivery make a difference to criminal case outcomes and clients' satisfaction? The public defence solicitor experiment. Research Portal (King's College London). 2004. 120–135.4 indexed citations
8.
Brown, Kevin J., Peter Duff, & Fiona Leverick. (2004). A Preliminary Analysis of the Bail/custody Decision in Relation to Female Accused. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).1 indexed citations
9.
Duff, Peter. (2002). Towards a Unified Theory of “Similar Facts Evidence” in Scots Law: Relevance, Fairness and the Reinterpretation of Moorov. 143–181.1 indexed citations
10.
Leverick, Fiona & Peter Duff. (2002). Court culture and adjournments in criminal cases: a tale of four courts. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 39–52.7 indexed citations
Duff, Peter. (2000). The defendant's right to trial by jury: A neighbour's view. 85–94.1 indexed citations
13.
Duff, Peter & Mark Findlay. (1997). Jury Reform: of Myths and Moral Panics. International Journal of the Sociology of Law. 25(4). 363–384.7 indexed citations
14.
Duff, Peter, et al.. (1996). Grounds of Appeal in Criminal Cases. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).2 indexed citations
15.
Findlay, Mark & Peter Duff. (1994). Jury Management in New South Wales. Institutional Knowledge (InK) - Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University (Singapore Management University).3 indexed citations
Findlay, Mark & Peter Duff. (1988). The Politics of Jury Reform. Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University). 209.1 indexed citations
19.
Shapland, Joanna, et al.. (1985). Victims in the criminal justice system. Medical Entomology and Zoology.202 indexed citations
20.
Duff, Peter, et al.. (1982). The Jury in England: Practice and Ideology. Institutional Knowledge (InK) - Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University (Singapore Management University). 10(3). 253.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.