Mark Ferguson
Impact in
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Development top 5%
Papers in
- Law 2
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies 2
-
- Noise Effects and Management 1
- Co-authors
- Rosemary McEachanHannah RobertsMartin DallimerPetia KostadinovaJoaquín ArtésCatherine MouryElin NaurinRobert Thomson
- Journals
- Journal of Peace Research (1 paper)American Journal of Political Science (1 paper)Landscape and Urban Planning (1 paper)Wellbeing Space and Society (1 paper)SSRN Electronic Journal (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSpain
In The Last Decade
Mark Ferguson
5 papers receiving 392 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Political Science and International Relations 216
- Development 27
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 83
- Communication 39
- Public Administration 18
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Ferguson
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Ferguson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Ferguson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Ferguson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Ferguson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Ferguson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Ferguson. The network helps show where Mark Ferguson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Mark Ferguson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 111 | |
| 3 | The Fulfillment of Parties’ Election Pledges: A Comparative Study on the Impact of Power Sharing Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 205 |
| 4 | Explaining the Fulfillment of Election Pledges: A Comparative Study on the Impact of Government Institutions | 2014 | 6 |
| 5 | The Program-to-Policy Linkage: A Comparative Study of Election Pledges and Government Policies in Ten Countries | 2014 | 10 |
| 6 | 2010 | 77 |
About Mark Ferguson
Mark Ferguson is a scholar working on Law, Speech and Hearing, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Strategy and Management and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 6 papers that have together received 409 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (2 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (2 papers), Noise Effects and Management (1 paper), Outdoor and Experiential Education (1 paper), Political Conflict and Governance (1 paper) and Gender Politics and Representation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (216 citations), Development (27 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (83 citations), Communication (39 citations) and Public Administration (18 citations). Mark Ferguson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Rosemary McEachan, Hannah Roberts, Martin Dallimer, Petia Kostadinova, Joaquín Artés, Catherine Moury, Elin Naurin, Robert Thomson, Terry Royed and Laurenz Ennser‐Jedenastik. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Peace Research, American Journal of Political Science, Landscape and Urban Planning, Wellbeing Space and Society and SSRN Electronic Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.