Wellbeing Space and Society

205 papers and 877 indexed citations i.

About

The 205 papers published in Wellbeing Space and Society in the last decades have received a total of 877 indexed citations. Papers published in Wellbeing Space and Society usually cover Sociology and Political Science (91 papers), General Health Professions (71 papers) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (60 papers) specifically the topics of Urban Green Space and Health (58 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (39 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (25 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Wellbeing Space and Society are Bing Pan, William L. Rice, Carmen Anthonj, Thomas Kistemann, Robin Kearns, Ingrid Robeyns, Pauline Marsh, Monika Egerer, Alessandro Ossola and Melody Smith.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Wellbeing Space and Society

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Wellbeing Space and Society. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Wellbeing Space and Society.

Countries where authors publish in Wellbeing Space and Society

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Wellbeing Space and Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Wellbeing Space and Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wellbeing Space and Society more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025