Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Fulfillment of Parties’ Election Pledges: A Comparative Study on the Impact of Power Sharing
2017205 citationsRobert Thomson, Terry Royed et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Thomson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Thomson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Thomson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Thomson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Thomson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Thomson. The network helps show where Robert Thomson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Thomson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Thomson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Thomson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Thomson. Robert Thomson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Thomson, Robert, Elin Naurin, & Terry Royed. (2019). A Comparative Analysis of Pledge Fulfillment. 57–80.2 indexed citations
2.
Huhe, Narisong, Daniel Naurin, & Robert Thomson. (2017). With or without you? Policy impact and networks in the Council of the EU after Brexit. European Policy Analysis.3 indexed citations
Thomson, Robert, Terry Royed, Elin Naurin, et al.. (2014). Explaining the Fulfillment of Election Pledges: A Comparative Study on the Impact of Government Institutions. SSRN Electronic Journal.6 indexed citations
6.
Thomson, Robert, Terry Royed, Elin Naurin, et al.. (2014). The Program-to-Policy Linkage: A Comparative Study of Election Pledges and Government Policies in Ten Countries. SSRN Electronic Journal.10 indexed citations
Thomson, Robert, Terry Royed, & Elin Naurin. (2010). The Program-to-Policy Linkage: A Comparative Study of Election Pledges and Government Policies in the United States, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Ireland. SSRN Electronic Journal.7 indexed citations
Thomson, Robert. (2007). The paradox of compliance: infringements and delays in transposing EU directives. Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology).1 indexed citations
14.
Thomson, Robert. (2006). The European Union Decides. Cambridge University Press eBooks.289 indexed citations
Stokman, Frans N. & Robert Thomson. (2004). Special Issue: winners and losers in european union decision making. European Union Politics. 5(1).7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.