Mark D. Drew

728 citations
14 papers · 613 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

    • Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis 4
    • Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 4
    • Chemical Synthesis and Reactions 3
    • Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 2
    • Synthesis of Tetrazole Derivatives 1
    • Fluorine in Organic Chemistry 2

Mark D. Drew

14 papers receiving 589 citations

Peers

Mark D. Drew
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 61
  • Inorganic Chemistry 241
  • Organic Chemistry 483
  • Molecular Biology 270
  • Pharmaceutical Science 16
Replace Mandy‐Nicole Birkholz with:
Mandy‐Nicole Birkholz Germany
C. Jakel Germany
Nicholas M. Leonard United States
Paulo Dani Netherlands
Aurélie Labonne Germany
Kumaravel Selvakumar India
A. Döhring Germany
Steven Dell United States
Pavel Starkov Estonia
Suman Sinha India
Mark D. Drew relative to Mandy‐Nicole Birkholz Germany Mandy‐Nicole Birkholz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Mandy‐Nicole Birkholz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark D. Drew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark D. Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark D. Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark D. Drew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark D. Drew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark D. Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark D. Drew. The network helps show where Mark D. Drew may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark D. Drew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark D. Drew Line = papers co-authored together Mark D. Drew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201227
2 201219
3 200774
4 200224
5 200119
6 200035
7 200050
8 199916
9 1999222
10 199929
11 199738
12 19978
13 199745
14 19717

About Mark D. Drew

Mark D. Drew is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Science, Molecular Biology, Inorganic Chemistry and Cancer Research, having authored 14 papers that have together received 613 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (10 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (4 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (4 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Reactions (3 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (2 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (2 papers), Synthesis of Tetrazole Derivatives (1 paper) and Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (61 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (241 citations), Organic Chemistry (483 citations), Molecular Biology (270 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (16 citations). Mark D. Drew has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas J. Lawrence, Simon M. Bushell, Martin O’Donnell, Joseph M. Salvino, Edward Orton, Richard S. Pottorf, William L. Scott, Paul Krolikowski, N. Vasant Kumar and Francisca Delgado. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Letters, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Chemical Communications, Synlett and Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026