Mark Curtis
Impact in
- History top 5%
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
- Scottish History and National Identity
- Historical Studies of British Isles
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science
Papers in
- History 3
- Scottish History and National Identity 2
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 1
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 1
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth 1
- Co-authors
- A. C. F. Beales (1 shared paper)Alan B. Cobban (1 shared paper)Caroline Robbins (1 shared paper)W. K. Jordan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Higher Education (4 papers)The American Historical Review (3 papers)History (1 paper)Past & Present (1 paper)British Journal of Educational Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCyprus
In The Last Decade
Mark Curtis
15 papers receiving 88 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- History 55
- History and Philosophy of Science 13
- Classics 10
- Political Science and International Relations 40
- Religious studies 7
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Curtis
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Curtis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Curtis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Curtis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Curtis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Curtis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Curtis. The network helps show where Mark Curtis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Mark Curtis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1960 | 52 | |
| 2 | 1962 | 19 | |
| 3 | 1961 | 18 | |
| 4 | 1980 | 16 | |
| 5 | 1970 | 12 | |
| 6 | 1963 | 8 | |
| 7 | 1964 | 6 | |
| 8 | 1972 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1984 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1984 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1958 | 3 | |
| 12 | Confronting an Ancient Dichotomy. A Proposal for Integrating Liberal and Professional Education. | 1985 | 2 |
| 13 | 1982 | 2 | |
| 14 | Development Finance Institutions and Responsible Corporate Tax Behaviour: Where we are, and the road ahead | 2016 | 2 |
| 15 | Reflections on the Civic Purpose of Liberal Learning. | 1981 | 1 |
| 16 | 1980 | 1 |
About Mark Curtis
Mark Curtis is a scholar working on History, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Music, having authored 16 papers that have together received 153 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (1 paper), Music History and Culture (1 paper), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (1 paper), Musicology and Musical Analysis (1 paper), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (1 paper) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (55 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (13 citations), Classics (10 citations), Political Science and International Relations (40 citations) and Religious studies (7 citations). Mark Curtis has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Cyprus. Frequent co-authors include A. C. F. Beales, Alan B. Cobban, Caroline Robbins and W. K. Jordan. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Higher Education, The American Historical Review, History, Past & Present and British Journal of Educational Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.