Mark C. Prescott

1.4k citations
61 papers · 1.2k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 12
    • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications 2
    • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 2
    • Helminth infection and control 6

Mark C. Prescott

61 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Mark C. Prescott
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Small Animals 122
  • Physiology 37
  • Spectroscopy 119
  • Sensory Systems 26
  • Molecular Biology 223
Replace Ayako Yoshida with:
Ayako Yoshida Japan
G. Babnigg United States
Jan Koolman Germany
Jessica L. Gifford Canada
Hugo Aguilaniu France
Huadong Yin China
David P. Thompson United States
Meredith Kusch United States
Stéphanie Gloux France
Andreas Turberg Germany
Mark C. Prescott relative to Ayako Yoshida Japan Ayako Yoshida's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12.3×
Ayako Yoshida · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark C. Prescott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark C. Prescott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark C. Prescott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark C. Prescott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark C. Prescott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark C. Prescott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark C. Prescott. The network helps show where Mark C. Prescott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark C. Prescott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark C. Prescott Line = papers co-authored together Mark C. Prescott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200877
2 201268
3 201055
4 200050
5 198946
6 198745
7 201844
8 201043
9 200042
10 198439
11 198839
12 201136
13 202036
14 198934
15 201232
16 198930
17 201030
18 198428
19 199628
20 201728

About Mark C. Prescott

Mark C. Prescott is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Small Animals, Molecular Biology, Sensory Systems and Insect Science, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (12 papers), Biochemical and Molecular Research (9 papers), Helminth infection and control (6 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (3 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (122 citations), Physiology (37 citations), Spectroscopy (119 citations), Sensory Systems (26 citations) and Molecular Biology (223 citations). Mark C. Prescott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Alexander G. McLennan, Huw H. Rees, L. John Goad, Richard P. Evershed, Geoffrey Wainwright, Peter M. Brophy, E. James LaCourse, Neil Spooner, Samïrah Perally and Robert Jeffrey Beynon. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Society Transactions, Journal of Mass Spectrometry, PLoS ONE, Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry and Nucleic Acids Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact