Mark Bradbury

1.1k total citations
39 papers, 696 citations indexed

About

Mark Bradbury is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Public Administration. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Bradbury has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 696 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 7 papers in Public Administration. Recurrent topics in Mark Bradbury's work include Public Policy and Administration Research (6 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (3 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers). Mark Bradbury is often cited by papers focused on Public Policy and Administration Research (6 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (3 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers). Mark Bradbury collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark. Mark Bradbury's co-authors include J. Edward Kellough, Joanna Macrae, Susanne Jaspars, Mark Duffield, Douglas Johnson, R. Paul Battaglio, Jerrell D. Coggburn, Stig Jarle Hansen, Stefanie A. Lindquist and Marian R. Williams and has published in prestigious journals such as Public Administration Review, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory and International Affairs.

In The Last Decade

Mark Bradbury

37 papers receiving 589 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Bradbury United States 11 349 285 188 166 76 39 696
Shannon Portillo United States 17 362 1.0× 205 0.7× 144 0.8× 237 1.4× 70 0.9× 41 743
John Wrench United Kingdom 14 348 1.0× 187 0.7× 179 1.0× 205 1.2× 27 0.4× 38 699
Julie Dolan United States 12 210 0.6× 273 1.0× 427 2.3× 196 1.2× 101 1.3× 27 686
Grace Hall Saltzstein United States 7 384 1.1× 205 0.7× 207 1.1× 126 0.8× 55 0.7× 9 634
Fiona Colgan United Kingdom 17 283 0.8× 151 0.5× 458 2.4× 348 2.1× 69 0.9× 25 801
Judith R. Saidel United States 10 393 1.1× 104 0.4× 168 0.9× 273 1.6× 111 1.5× 17 658
Muhammad Azfar Nisar Pakistan 12 187 0.5× 186 0.7× 55 0.3× 160 1.0× 53 0.7× 29 489
Zachary W. Oberfield United States 12 279 0.8× 142 0.5× 129 0.7× 268 1.6× 96 1.3× 15 656
Tessa Wright United Kingdom 16 286 0.8× 74 0.3× 450 2.4× 196 1.2× 68 0.9× 32 744
C. Elizabeth Hirsh United States 12 313 0.9× 69 0.2× 298 1.6× 109 0.7× 78 1.0× 15 627

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Bradbury

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Bradbury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Bradbury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Bradbury more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Bradbury

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Bradbury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Bradbury. The network helps show where Mark Bradbury may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Bradbury

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Bradbury. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Bradbury based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Bradbury. Mark Bradbury is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kleist, Nauja, et al.. (2025). Situated polycrises: Somali responses to COVID-19. International Affairs. 101(1). 233–252. 1 indexed citations
2.
Bradbury, Mark, et al.. (2022). Book Review: The stay interview: A manager’s guide to keeping the best and brightest. Review of Public Personnel Administration. 42(4). 789–794. 1 indexed citations
3.
Coggburn, Jerrell D., R. Paul Battaglio, & Mark Bradbury. (2014). Employee job satisfaction and organizational performance: The role of conflict management. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior. 17(4). 498–530. 27 indexed citations
4.
Bradbury, Mark, et al.. (2013). President Lincoln, the Civil War, and the Dawn of Gender Representation in the U.S. Federal Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review. 73(1). 188–190. 1 indexed citations
5.
Coggburn, Jerrell D., et al.. (2012). Constructive Conflict Management and Employee Perception of Performance in the U.S Federal Government. SSRN Electronic Journal.
6.
Bazerman, Max H., et al.. (2012). Book Review. Public Integrity. 14(4). 413–422. 9 indexed citations
7.
Bradbury, Mark. (2011). Representation and Diversity in the Federal Government. Review of Public Personnel Administration. 31(4). 424–431. 5 indexed citations
8.
Bradbury, Mark, et al.. (2009). Extreme Outsourcing in Local Government. Review of Public Personnel Administration. 29(3). 230–248. 15 indexed citations
9.
Bradbury, Mark & J. Edward Kellough. (2007). Representative Bureaucracy: Exploring the Potential for Active Representation in Local Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 18(4). 697–714. 158 indexed citations
10.
Bradbury, Mark. (2007). The Legal and Managerial Challenge of Obesity as a Disability. Review of Public Personnel Administration. 27(1). 79–90. 6 indexed citations
11.
Lindquist, Stefanie A., et al.. (2006). Evaluating Performance in State Judicial Institutions: Trust and Confidence in the Georgia Judiciary. State and Local Government Review. 38(3). 176–190. 22 indexed citations
12.
Bradbury, Mark, et al.. (2003). Living without a Government in Somalia: An Interview with Mark Bradbury: Development Processes in Somalia Exist Not as a Result of Official Development Assistance, but in Spite of It. Journal of international affairs. 57(1). 201–217. 1 indexed citations
13.
Bradbury, Mark. (2003). Living With Statelessness: The Somali Road to Development. Conflict Security and Development. 3(1). 7–25. 15 indexed citations
14.
Bradbury, Mark, et al.. (2003). Race and the Georgia court: Implications of the Georgia public trust and confidence survey for Batson v. Kentucky and its progeny. NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro). 2 indexed citations
15.
Bradbury, Mark, et al.. (2003). Somaliland: choosing politics over violence. Review of African Political Economy. 30(97). 42 indexed citations
16.
Bradbury, Mark. (1998). Sudan: international responses to war in the Nuba mountains. Review of African Political Economy. 25(77). 9 indexed citations
17.
Macrae, Joanna, Mark Bradbury, Susanne Jaspars, Douglas Johnson, & Mark Duffield. (1997). Conflict, the Continuum and Chronic Emergencies: A Critical Analysis of the Scope for Linking Relief, Rehabilitation and Development Planning in Sudan. Disasters. 21(3). 223–243. 64 indexed citations
18.
Bradbury, Mark, et al.. (1995). Conflict and Development: Organisational Adaptation in Conflict Situations. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique). 7 indexed citations
19.
Bradbury, Mark. (1994). The Somali conflict : prospects for peace : an exploratory report for Oxfam (UK and Ireland), October 1993. 8 indexed citations
20.
Bradbury, Mark. (1994). The Somali Conflict: Prospects for Peace. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique). 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026