Mario Pena
Impact in
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Emotional Intelligence and Performance
- Stress and Burnout Research
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Papers in
-
- Emotional Intelligence and Performance 6
- Stress and Burnout Research 4
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction 2
- Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation 1
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 1
- Co-authors
- Natalio Extremera (4 shared papers)Lourdes Rey (4 shared papers)Marc A. Brackett (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Revista de Psicodidáctica (1 paper)Frontiers in Psychology (1 paper)Psychosocial Intervention (1 paper)PeerJ (1 paper)Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- Spain
In The Last Decade
Mario Pena
8 papers receiving 331 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Social Psychology 268
- Applied Psychology 28
- Life-span and Life-course Studies 5
- Clinical Psychology 92
- Education 102
Countries citing papers authored by Mario Pena
This map shows the geographic impact of Mario Pena's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mario Pena with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mario Pena more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mario Pena
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mario Pena. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mario Pena. The network helps show where Mario Pena may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Mario Pena, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 150 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 64 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 8 | Perceived Emotional Intelligence, Self-Esteem and Life Satisfaction in Adolescents * Inteligencia Emocional Percibida, Autoestima y Satisfacción con la Vida en Adolescentes | 2011 | 3 |
About Mario Pena
Mario Pena is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Education and General Health Professions, having authored 8 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotional Intelligence and Performance (6 papers), Stress and Burnout Research (4 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers), Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (1 paper), Education and Teacher Training (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (268 citations), Applied Psychology (28 citations), Life-span and Life-course Studies (5 citations), Clinical Psychology (92 citations) and Education (102 citations). Mario Pena has collaborated with scholars based in Spain. Frequent co-authors include Natalio Extremera, Lourdes Rey and Marc A. Brackett. Their work appears in journals such as Revista de Psicodidáctica, Frontiers in Psychology, Psychosocial Intervention, PeerJ and Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.