Maria Rita Marques
About
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maria Rita Marques
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maria Rita Marques. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maria Rita Marques based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maria Rita Marques. Maria Rita Marques is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Maria Rita Marques
33 papers receiving 609 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Maria Rita Marques
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maria Rita Marques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maria Rita Marques. The network helps show where Maria Rita Marques may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Maria Rita Marques
This map shows the geographic impact of Maria Rita Marques's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maria Rita Marques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maria Rita Marques more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.