Aaron Stalnaker

608 citations
14 papers · 183 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Chinese history and philosophy 8
    • Religion and Society Interactions 3
    • Religion, Society, and Development 2
    • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 3

Aaron Stalnaker

13 papers receiving 108 citations

Peers

Aaron Stalnaker
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Religious studies 30
  • Philosophy 53
  • Sociology and Political Science 122
  • Political Science and International Relations 61
  • Health 17
Replace Gustavo Benavides with:
Gustavo Benavides United States
Jan Platvoet Netherlands
Ann Gleig United States
June McDaniel United States
Victoria S. Harrison United Kingdom
Dale S. Wright United States
Catherine Pickstock United Kingdom
Julius Lipner United Kingdom
Roger R. Jackson United States
Denys Turner United Kingdom
Aaron Stalnaker relative to Gustavo Benavides United States Gustavo Benavides's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Gustavo Benavides · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Aaron Stalnaker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aaron Stalnaker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aaron Stalnaker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aaron Stalnaker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aaron Stalnaker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aaron Stalnaker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aaron Stalnaker. The network helps show where Aaron Stalnaker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Aaron Stalnaker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Aaron Stalnaker Line = papers co-authored together Aaron Stalnaker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 200664
2 201021
3 201318
4 200515
5 200515
6 200814
7 201412
8 20128
9 20034
10 20164
11
Religious Ethics in a Time of Globalism: Shaping a Third Wave of Comparative Analysis
20122
12 20042
13 20042
14
Augustine and World Religions
20082

About Aaron Stalnaker

Aaron Stalnaker is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy and Social Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 183 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (8 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers), Karl Barth and Christian Theology (1 paper), Indian and Buddhist Studies (1 paper) and Medieval Philosophy and Theology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (30 citations), Philosophy (53 citations), Sociology and Political Science (122 citations), Political Science and International Relations (61 citations) and Health (17 citations). Aaron Stalnaker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth M. Bucar, Thomas A. Lewis, Michael Barnes, Francis X. Clooney and Paula Fredriksen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Religious Ethics, Dao, Journal of Military Ethics, Philosophy East and West and European Journal for Philosophy of Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact