Mari Jibu

940 total citations
36 papers, 588 citations indexed

About

Mari Jibu is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Physiology and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Mari Jibu has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 588 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 7 papers in Physiology and 7 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Mari Jibu's work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (6 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (6 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (6 papers). Mari Jibu is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Mechanics and Applications (6 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (6 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (6 papers). Mari Jibu collaborates with scholars based in Japan, France and United States. Mari Jibu's co-authors include Kunio Yasue, Karl H. Pribram, Scott Hagan, Stuart R. Hameroff, Takahiro Kawamura, Naoya Matsumoto, Jean-Claude Zambrini, Masaru Yarime, Tetsuya Misawa and Takashi Nakagawa and has published in prestigious journals such as Physics Letters A, Scientometrics and Biosystems.

In The Last Decade

Mari Jibu

35 papers receiving 481 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mari Jibu Japan 9 229 190 188 133 129 36 588
Elio Conte Italy 16 404 1.8× 162 0.9× 129 0.7× 44 0.3× 154 1.2× 65 719
Sisir Roy India 11 124 0.5× 47 0.2× 88 0.5× 43 0.3× 33 0.3× 78 358
James F. Glazebrook United States 17 204 0.9× 34 0.2× 194 1.0× 73 0.5× 92 0.7× 70 736
Roman R. Poznański Malaysia 15 67 0.3× 44 0.2× 313 1.7× 254 1.9× 34 0.3× 60 578
Gennaro Auletta Italy 13 182 0.8× 41 0.2× 112 0.6× 13 0.1× 107 0.8× 46 479
Elisabeth Rieper Singapore 5 265 1.2× 47 0.2× 45 0.2× 72 0.5× 170 1.3× 9 485
Michel Bitbol France 14 106 0.5× 129 0.7× 222 1.2× 12 0.1× 26 0.2× 63 723
Partha Ghose India 11 242 1.1× 102 0.5× 41 0.2× 23 0.2× 115 0.9× 55 503
Kamales Bhaumik India 9 141 0.6× 63 0.3× 39 0.2× 37 0.3× 90 0.7× 31 267
Yuri Dabaghian United States 12 108 0.5× 140 0.7× 286 1.5× 230 1.7× 40 0.3× 44 751

Countries citing papers authored by Mari Jibu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mari Jibu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mari Jibu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mari Jibu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mari Jibu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mari Jibu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mari Jibu. The network helps show where Mari Jibu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mari Jibu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mari Jibu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mari Jibu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mari Jibu. Mari Jibu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kawamura, Takahiro, et al.. (2018). Content-based Map of Science using Cross-lingual Document Embedding - A Comparison of US-Japan Funded Projects. Leiden Repository (Leiden University). 385–394. 1 indexed citations
2.
Kawamura, Takahiro, et al.. (2018). Funding map using paragraph embedding based on semantic diversity. Scientometrics. 116(2). 941–958. 4 indexed citations
3.
Kawamura, Takahiro, et al.. (2017). Funding Map for Research Project Relationships using Paragraph Vectors.. ISSI. 1107–1117. 2 indexed citations
4.
Jibu, Mari, et al.. (2014). Development of new indicators for the launch of AMED (7) : Trend analysis for US NIH funding. Journal of Information Processing and Management. 57(6). 395–406. 2 indexed citations
5.
Jibu, Mari, et al.. (2014). Development of new indicators for the launch of AMED (8) : Knowledge flows of the pharmaceutical innovation system. Journal of Information Processing and Management. 57(8). 562–572. 6 indexed citations
6.
Jibu, Mari, et al.. (2014). Development of new indicators for the launch of a Japanese version of the NIH (5) : Analysis based on refined indicators for patents linked with marketed drugs and pipelines. Journal of Information Processing and Management. 57(3). 178–186. 4 indexed citations
7.
Jibu, Mari, et al.. (2014). Development of new indicators for the launch of AMED (6) : A disease-specific overview and future prospects of pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Information Processing and Management. 57(5). 323–333. 4 indexed citations
8.
Jibu, Mari, et al.. (2014). Development of new indicators for the launch of a Japanese version of the NIH (4) : Refined indicators for patents linked with marketed drugs and pipelines. Journal of Information Processing and Management. 57(1). 29–37. 5 indexed citations
9.
Jibu, Mari, et al.. (2013). Development of new indicators for the launch of a Japanese version of the NIH (1) : An overview and future prospects of pharmaceutical industry based on new indicators. Journal of Information Processing and Management. 56(7). 448–458. 8 indexed citations
10.
Jibu, Mari, et al.. (2013). Development of new indicators for the launch of a Japanese version of the NIH (2) : A technology-specific overview and future prospects of pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Information Processing and Management. 56(9). 611–621. 8 indexed citations
11.
Jibu, Mari, et al.. (2013). Development of new indicators for the launch of a Japanese version of the NIH (3) : Analysis of entities conducting pharmaceutical R^|^amp;D activities. Journal of Information Processing and Management. 56(10). 685–696. 6 indexed citations
12.
Jibu, Mari, et al.. (2012). Toward the development of “J-GLOBAL foresight”. Journal of Information Processing and Management. 54(10). 639–651. 1 indexed citations
13.
Jibu, Mari. (2011). Science of future approach : An overview of foresight. Journal of Information Processing and Management. 54(4). 200–210. 2 indexed citations
14.
Jibu, Mari, et al.. (2010). Evaluation of JST's research performance based on science linkage (Part 2) : A case study of visualization. Journal of Information Processing and Management. 52(11). 651–659.
15.
Yasue, Kunio, et al.. (2002). No Matter, Never Mind. 5 indexed citations
16.
Jibu, Mari & Kunio Yasue. (1997). What is Mind? - Quantum Field Theory of Evanescent Photons in Brain as Quantum Theory of Consciousness.. Informatica (slovenia). 21. 27 indexed citations
17.
Jibu, Mari & Kunio Yasue. (1997). Magic without magic: Meaning of quantum brain dynamics. ˜The œJournal of mind and behavior. 18. 205–227. 4 indexed citations
18.
Jibu, Mari, Kunio Yasue, & Scott Hagan. (1997). Evanescent (tunneling) photon and cellular `vision'. Biosystems. 42(1). 65–73. 21 indexed citations
19.
Jibu, Mari & Kunio Yasue. (1995). Quantum Brain Dynamics and Consciousness. 74 indexed citations
20.
Jibu, Mari, Scott Hagan, Stuart R. Hameroff, Karl H. Pribram, & Kunio Yasue. (1994). Quantum optical coherence in cytoskeletal microtubules: implications for brain function. Biosystems. 32(3). 195–209. 138 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026