Elisabeth Rieper

869 total citations
9 papers, 485 citations indexed

About

Elisabeth Rieper is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Elisabeth Rieper has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 485 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, 3 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 3 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Elisabeth Rieper's work include Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (3 papers), Statistical Mechanics and Entropy (3 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers). Elisabeth Rieper is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (3 papers), Statistical Mechanics and Entropy (3 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers). Elisabeth Rieper collaborates with scholars based in Singapore, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Elisabeth Rieper's co-authors include Vlatko Vedral, John J. L. Morton, Erik M. Gauger, Simon C. Benjamin, Renato Renner, Oscar Dahlsten, P. C. W. Davies, Jack A. Tuszyński, Karoline Wiesner and Mile Gu and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications and New Journal of Physics.

In The Last Decade

Elisabeth Rieper

9 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Elisabeth Rieper Singapore	5	265	170	163	76	72	9	485
Thomas Juffmann Austria	13	390 1.5×	126 0.7×	53 0.3×	69 0.9×	35 0.5×	31	642
Tony Leggett United States	4	213 0.8×	108 0.6×	50 0.3×	17 0.2×	37 0.5×	7	279
James F. Glazebrook United States	17	204 0.8×	92 0.5×	131 0.8×	12 0.2×	73 1.0×	70	736
Guang-Yin Chen Taiwan	18	1.2k 4.7×	747 4.4×	332 2.0×	55 0.7×	108 1.5×	41	1.6k
Alexey V. Melkikh Russia	15	141 0.5×	84 0.5×	177 1.1×	13 0.2×	72 1.0×	92	747
Isabel Gonzalo Spain	14	357 1.3×	104 0.6×	47 0.3×	6 0.1×	93 1.3×	63	734
L. Kuhnert Germany	10	201 0.8×	82 0.5×	294 1.8×	38 0.5×	203 2.8×	19	1.1k
Emilio Del Giudice Italy	16	242 0.9×	34 0.2×	120 0.7×	333 4.4×	120 1.7×	27	1.1k
Zhedong Zhang China	14	473 1.8×	195 1.1×	61 0.4×	22 0.3×	23 0.3×	42	747
Mari Jibu Japan	9	229 0.9×	129 0.8×	77 0.5×	17 0.2×	133 1.8×	36	588

Countries citing papers authored by Elisabeth Rieper

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elisabeth Rieper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elisabeth Rieper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elisabeth Rieper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elisabeth Rieper

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elisabeth Rieper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elisabeth Rieper. The network helps show where Elisabeth Rieper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elisabeth Rieper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elisabeth Rieper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elisabeth Rieper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elisabeth Rieper. Elisabeth Rieper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Gu, Mile, Karoline Wiesner, Elisabeth Rieper, & Vlatko Vedral. (2012). Quantum mechanics can reduce the complexity of classical models. Nature Communications. 3(1). 762–762. 65 indexed citations

2.

Davies, P. C. W., Elisabeth Rieper, & Jack A. Tuszyński. (2012). Self-organization and entropy reduction in a living cell. Biosystems. 111(1). 1–10. 71 indexed citations

3.

Wiesner, Karoline, Mile Gu, Elisabeth Rieper, & Vlatko Vedral. (2012). Information-theoretic lower bound on energy cost of stochastic computation. Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences. 468(2148). 4058–4066. 11 indexed citations

4.

Gu, Mile, Karoline Wiesner, Elisabeth Rieper, & Vlatko Vedral. (2011). Sharpening Occam's Razor with Quantum Mechanics. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations

5.

Dahlsten, Oscar, Renato Renner, Elisabeth Rieper, & Vlatko Vedral. (2011). Inadequacy of von Neumann entropy for characterising extractable work. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2011. 1 indexed citations

6.

Gauger, Erik M., Elisabeth Rieper, John J. L. Morton, Simon C. Benjamin, & Vlatko Vedral. (2011). Sustained Quantum Coherence and Entanglement in the Avian Compass. Physical Review Letters. 106(4). 40503–40503. 234 indexed citations

7.

Dahlsten, Oscar, Renato Renner, Elisabeth Rieper, & Vlatko Vedral. (2011). Inadequacy of von Neumann entropy for characterizing extractable work. New Journal of Physics. 13(5). 53015–53015. 97 indexed citations

8.

Rieper, Elisabeth. (2011). Quantum Coherence in Biological Systems. National University of Singapore. 1 indexed citations

9.

Rieper, Elisabeth, Janet Anders, & Vlatko Vedral. (2010). The relevance of continuous variable entanglement in DNA. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact