Elio Conte

110 total papers · 1.1k total citations
65 papers, 718 citations indexed

About

Elio Conte is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Elio Conte has authored 65 papers receiving a total of 718 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 15 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and 15 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Elio Conte's work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (36 papers), Biofield Effects and Biophysics (14 papers) and Chaos control and synchronization (7 papers). Elio Conte is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Mechanics and Applications (36 papers), Biofield Effects and Biophysics (14 papers) and Chaos control and synchronization (7 papers). Elio Conte collaborates with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Elio Conte's co-authors include Antonio Federici, Joseph P. Zbilut, Orlando Todarello, Andrei Khrennikov, Antonio Vena, R Giuliani, Mario Mastrolonardo, Gaetano Perchiazzi, Franco Orsucci and Marisa Megna and has published in prestigious journals such as European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Chaos Solitons & Fractals and Symmetry.

In The Last Decade

Elio Conte

59 papers receiving 579 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Elio Conte 404 162 154 147 128 65 718
Irina Basieva 530 1.3× 52 0.3× 334 2.2× 257 1.7× 52 0.4× 59 843
James F. Glazebrook 197 0.5× 34 0.2× 92 0.6× 130 0.9× 194 1.5× 70 735
Jeffrey A. Barrett 337 0.8× 94 0.6× 189 1.2× 135 0.9× 59 0.5× 71 855
Thomas Filk 190 0.5× 35 0.2× 108 0.7× 299 2.0× 103 0.8× 36 696
Luis de la Peña 636 1.6× 128 0.8× 186 1.2× 376 2.6× 41 0.3× 73 787
John G. Cramer 527 1.3× 169 1.0× 200 1.3× 165 1.1× 38 0.3× 35 867
Richard Healey 561 1.4× 116 0.7× 141 0.9× 140 1.0× 46 0.4× 39 843
Itamar Pitowsky 702 1.7× 77 0.5× 482 3.1× 180 1.2× 26 0.2× 41 850
M. Courbage 224 0.6× 17 0.1× 88 0.6× 528 3.6× 166 1.3× 61 880
Hartmann Römer 229 0.6× 87 0.5× 55 0.4× 216 1.5× 88 0.7× 58 892

Countries citing papers authored by Elio Conte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elio Conte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elio Conte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elio Conte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elio Conte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elio Conte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elio Conte. The network helps show where Elio Conte may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elio Conte

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elio Conte. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elio Conte based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elio Conte. Elio Conte is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026