Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner
- Physiology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Co-authors
- Xinqing ZhangAchim RosemannDouglas SippClare BlackburnChristopher McCabeAlastair KentTimothy CaulfieldSarah Chan
- Topics
- Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (45 papers)Ethics in Clinical Research (20 papers)Science, Research, and Medicine (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomChinaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner
70 papers receiving 852 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Physiology 469
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 274
- Molecular Biology 266
- Reproductive Medicine 194
- General Health Professions 141
Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner
This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner. The network helps show where Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner. Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | Human Genetic Biobanks in Asia : Politics of trust and scientific advancement | 27 |
| 18 | The Chinese academy of social sciences: shaping the reforms, academia and china (CASS)(1977-2003) | 4 |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | Genomics in Asia: Cultural Values and Bioethical Practices | 3 |
About Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner
Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Physiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 73 papers that have together received 926 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (45 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (20 papers) and Science, Research, and Medicine (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (194 citations), Physiology (469 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (274 citations). Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Xinqing Zhang, Achim Rosemann, Douglas Sipp, Clare Blackburn, Christopher McCabe, Alastair Kent, Timothy Caulfield, Sarah Chan, Esther van Zimmeren and Megan Munsie. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Social Science & Medicine and Science Translational Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.