Yali Cong

1.0k total citations
24 papers, 253 citations indexed

About

Yali Cong is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Yali Cong has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 253 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 10 papers in General Health Professions and 8 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Yali Cong's work include Ethics in medical practice (10 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (8 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (5 papers). Yali Cong is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in medical practice (10 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (8 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (5 papers). Yali Cong collaborates with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Yali Cong's co-authors include Xiaojie Li, Jing-Bao Nie, Joseph D. Tucker, Juergen A. Knoblich, Herbert Gottweis, Harun Ur Rashid, He Jing, Hiromitsu Nakauchi, Roger A. Pedersen and Aasim Ahmad and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Social Science & Medicine and Stem Cell Reports.

In The Last Decade

Yali Cong

23 papers receiving 243 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Yali Cong China	7	135	117	32	30	27	24	253
Connie Lu United States	9	137 1.0×	147 1.3×	25 0.8×	78 2.6×	14 0.5×	32	407
Fei Fei Huang China	9	102 0.8×	157 1.3×	25 0.8×	7 0.2×	15 0.6×	32	309
Mary L. Greaney United States	11	213 1.6×	95 0.8×	42 1.3×	18 0.6×	44 1.6×	14	348
Carrie L. Nacht United States	9	37 0.3×	82 0.7×	37 1.2×	15 0.5×	38 1.4×	41	250
Maria Dimitriadou Cyprus	7	116 0.9×	145 1.2×	50 1.6×	8 0.3×	12 0.4×	13	361
Giulia Grotto Italy	8	92 0.7×	83 0.7×	43 1.3×	17 0.6×	10 0.4×	19	264
Jaedon P. Avey United States	10	93 0.7×	121 1.0×	33 1.0×	15 0.5×	26 1.0×	34	257
Marion Boulicault United States	8	101 0.7×	31 0.3×	15 0.5×	26 0.9×	10 0.4×	18	307
Susan Kornetsky United States	6	184 1.4×	88 0.8×	56 1.8×	15 0.5×	67 2.5×	10	295
Camella J. Rising United States	10	57 0.4×	126 1.1×	32 1.0×	8 0.3×	26 1.0×	30	306

Countries citing papers authored by Yali Cong

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Yali Cong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yali Cong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yali Cong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Yali Cong

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yali Cong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yali Cong. The network helps show where Yali Cong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Yali Cong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Yali Cong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Yali Cong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Yali Cong. Yali Cong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Zhang, H. H., et al.. (2025). [Interpretation of the ethical requirements set forth by the 2024 Declaration of Helsinki: a researcher perspective].. PubMed. 105(10). 719–725.

Cong, Yali, et al.. (2025). Ethical consideration of the limitation of substitute judgement and AI preference predictors in medical decision-making. Journal of Medical Ethics. 51(7). 467–468. 1 indexed citations

Cong, Yali & James Dwyer. (2023). The Duty to Care is Not Dead Yet. Asian Bioethics Review. 15(4). 505–515. 1 indexed citations

Li, Shu, Jing Xie, Ziyi Chen, et al.. (2023). Key elements and checklist of shared decision-making conversation on life-sustaining treatment in emergency: a multispecialty study from China. World Journal of Emergency Medicine. 14(5). 380–380. 2 indexed citations

Barker, Roger A., Gerard J. Boer, Elena Cattaneo, et al.. (2022). The need for a standard for informed consent for collection of human fetal material. Stem Cell Reports. 17(6). 1245–1247. 5 indexed citations

Cong, Yali, et al.. (2022). Rethinking the Precedent Autonomy, Current Minimal Autonomy, and Current Well-Being in Medical Decisions for Persons with Dementia. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. 19(1). 163–175. 3 indexed citations

Li, Xiaojie, et al.. (2022). Research under China’s personal information law. Science. 378(6621). 713–715. 4 indexed citations

Li, Xiaojie & Yali Cong. (2021). A Systematic Literature Review of Ethical Challenges Related to Medical and Public Health Data Sharing in China. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 16(5). 537–554. 4 indexed citations

Cong, Yali, et al.. (2021). Ethical Perspectives of Chinese and United States Physicians at Initiation of a Research Collaborative. Accountability in Research. 29(5). 294–308. 1 indexed citations

10.

Li, Xiaojie, et al.. (2021). Regional Differences Among Bone Marrow Registrants: The Results of a Cross-Sectional Telephone-Based Survey. Transplantation Proceedings. 53(2). 724–729. 1 indexed citations

11.

Hyun, Insoo, Ellen Wright Clayton, Yali Cong, et al.. (2021). ISSCR guidelines for the transfer of human pluripotent stem cells and their direct derivatives into animal hosts. Stem Cell Reports. 16(6). 1409–1415. 18 indexed citations

12.

Cong, Yali, et al.. (2021). Persons with pre‐dementia have no Kantian duty to die. Bioethics. 35(5). 438–445. 1 indexed citations

13.

Nie, Jing‐Bao, et al.. (2020). Conflict of Interest in Scientific Research in China: A Socio-ethical Analysis of He Jiankui’s Human Genome-editing Experiment. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. 17(2). 191–201. 8 indexed citations

14.

Cong, Yali. (2019). Comments on the CRISPR Gene-edited babies’ case. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics. IV(4). 297–300. 1 indexed citations

15.

Sherer, Renslow, Hongmei Dong, Yali Cong, et al.. (2017). Medical ethics education in China: Lessons from three schools. Education for Health. 30(1). 35–35. 13 indexed citations

16.

Nie, Jing-Bao, et al.. (2015). Medical Professionalism in China and the United States: A Transcultural Interpretation. The Journal of Clinical Ethics. 26(1). 48–60. 17 indexed citations

17.

Pratt, Bridget, Yali Cong, Harun Ur Rashid, et al.. (2014). Perspectives from South and East Asia on Clinical and Research Ethics: A Literature Review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 9(2). 52–67. 12 indexed citations

18.

Wahlberg, Ayo, Christoph Rehmann‐Sutter, Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner, et al.. (2013). From global bioethics to ethical governance of biomedical research collaborations. Social Science & Medicine. 98. 293–300. 24 indexed citations

19.

Cong, Yali. (2007). From Chinese Values of Life to Exploring the Ethical Aspects of Stem Cell Research in Mainland China. Contemporary Chinese Thought. 39(2). 18–31. 3 indexed citations

20.

Cong, Yali. (2004). Doctor-Family-Patient Relationship: The Chinese Paradigm of Informed Consent. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 29(2). 149–178. 123 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact