Margaret Shapiro
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Demography top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jennifer TichonJeni WarburtonDeborah J. TerryJohn WesternJake M. NajmanJ. D. KeepingAnne B. ChangJ. Morrison
- Topics
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers)Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers)Corporate Identity and Reputation (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Margaret Shapiro
18 papers receiving 393 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Sociology and Political Science 227
- General Health Professions 105
- Demography 80
- Social Psychology 77
- Health 58
Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Shapiro
This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Shapiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Shapiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Shapiro more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret Shapiro
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Shapiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Shapiro. The network helps show where Margaret Shapiro may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret Shapiro
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret Shapiro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret Shapiro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret Shapiro. Margaret Shapiro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | Stakeholder perspectives of organisational reputation | 1 |
| 8 | 54 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 115 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 88 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | Socio-economic Status Differences in Patients' Desire For and Capacity to Obtain Information in the Clinical Encounter | 5 |
| 19 | 58 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About Margaret Shapiro
Margaret Shapiro is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Administration and Language and Linguistics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers) and Corporate Identity and Reputation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (58 citations), Demography (80 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (10 citations). Margaret Shapiro has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer Tichon, Jeni Warburton, Deborah J. Terry, John Western, Jake M. Najman, J. D. Keeping, Anne B. Chang, J. Morrison, Carole Cragg and Deborah Setterlund. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Medical Education and Family Process.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.