Margaret Shapiro

600 total citations
20 papers, 437 citations indexed

About

Margaret Shapiro is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Margaret Shapiro has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 437 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in General Health Professions, 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Margaret Shapiro's work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers) and Corporate Identity and Reputation (2 papers). Margaret Shapiro is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers) and Corporate Identity and Reputation (2 papers). Margaret Shapiro collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Margaret Shapiro's co-authors include Jennifer Tichon, Jeni Warburton, Deborah J. Terry, John Western, Jake M. Najman, J. Morrison, Anne B. Chang, J. D. Keeping, Carole Cragg and Deborah Setterlund and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Medical Education and Family Process.

In The Last Decade

Margaret Shapiro

18 papers receiving 393 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Margaret Shapiro Australia 10 227 105 80 77 58 20 437
Teresa Mastin United States 14 170 0.7× 93 0.9× 94 1.2× 54 0.7× 58 1.0× 24 521
Susan P. Robbins United States 9 167 0.7× 181 1.7× 36 0.5× 53 0.7× 78 1.3× 35 543
Kerry McCallum Australia 14 214 0.9× 103 1.0× 44 0.6× 28 0.4× 97 1.7× 67 563
Mariah Mantsun Cheng United States 9 227 1.0× 167 1.6× 52 0.7× 83 1.1× 48 0.8× 13 595
Elizabeth M. Grieco United States 8 337 1.5× 98 0.9× 53 0.7× 36 0.5× 44 0.8× 10 530
Silke L. Schneider Germany 12 671 3.0× 85 0.8× 66 0.8× 59 0.8× 43 0.7× 25 980
Aliya R. Chapman United States 5 139 0.6× 169 1.6× 27 0.3× 58 0.8× 99 1.7× 6 426
Ransford Danso Canada 9 336 1.5× 136 1.3× 41 0.5× 58 0.8× 25 0.4× 9 525
Alita Nandi United Kingdom 15 346 1.5× 122 1.2× 47 0.6× 67 0.9× 105 1.8× 26 531
Kirsten Weber United States 9 154 0.7× 55 0.5× 29 0.4× 138 1.8× 16 0.3× 34 448

Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Shapiro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Shapiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Shapiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Shapiro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret Shapiro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Shapiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Shapiro. The network helps show where Margaret Shapiro may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret Shapiro

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret Shapiro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret Shapiro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret Shapiro. Margaret Shapiro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wenke, Rachel, Joan Carlini, Kelly A. Weir, et al.. (2025). Co-design of an Australian health service framework and implementation plan for involving consumers in research. Public Health Research & Practice. 35(2).
2.
Wenke, Rachel, Joan Carlini, Kelly A. Weir, et al.. (2024). Exploring barriers and solutions to consumer involvement in health service research using a nominal group technique. Research Involvement and Engagement. 10(1). 72–72. 7 indexed citations
3.
Hattingh, Laetitia, Joan Carlini, Kelly A. Weir, et al.. (2024). Consumer involvement in health service research: a cross-sectional survey of staff in an Australian public hospital and health service. Australian Health Review. 49(1). 2 indexed citations
4.
Tobiano, Georgia, et al.. (2022). Development and psychometric testing of the patient participation in bedside handover survey. Health Expectations. 25(5). 2492–2502. 5 indexed citations
5.
Briggs, Lynne, et al.. (2021). Engaging young people in early psychosis services – a challenge for social work. Social Work in Mental Health. 19(2). 105–125. 3 indexed citations
6.
Shapiro, Margaret, et al.. (2014). Teaching Trauma Theory and Practice in MSW Programs: A Clinically Focused, Case-Based Method. Clinical Social Work Journal. 42(4). 408–418. 14 indexed citations
7.
Bahr, Mark, et al.. (2010). Stakeholder perspectives of organisational reputation. Bond University Research Portal (Bond University). 215–223. 1 indexed citations
8.
Shapiro, Margaret. (2007). Money: A Therapeutic Tool for Couples Therapy. Family Process. 46(3). 279–291. 54 indexed citations
9.
Warburton, Jeni, et al.. (2004). A nice thing to do but is it critical for business? Corporate responsibility and Australian business. Australian Journal of Social Issues. 39(2). 117–127. 7 indexed citations
10.
Tichon, Jennifer & Margaret Shapiro. (2003). The Process of Sharing Social Support in Cyberspace. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 6(2). 161–170. 115 indexed citations
11.
Shapiro, Margaret, et al.. (2003). Violence in the workplace: awareness and prevention. Australian Health Review. 26(1). 84–91. 18 indexed citations
12.
Shapiro, Margaret, Deborah Setterlund, & Carole Cragg. (2003). Capturing the Complexity of Women’s Experiences: A Mixed-Method Approach to Studying Incontinence in Older Women. Affilia. 18(1). 21–33. 12 indexed citations
13.
Tichon, Jennifer & Margaret Shapiro. (2003). With a Little Help from My Friends: Children, the Internet and Social Support. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 21(4). 73–92. 16 indexed citations
14.
Warburton, Jeni, et al.. (2001). Differences between Older Volunteers and Nonvolunteers. Research on Aging. 23(5). 586–605. 88 indexed citations
15.
Shapiro, Margaret, et al.. (1994). Community Development in Primary Health Care. Community Development Journal. 29(3). 222–231. 1 indexed citations
16.
Shapiro, Margaret, et al.. (1992). Medical education in Thailand. Medical Education. 26(3). 251–258. 6 indexed citations
17.
Shapiro, Margaret, et al.. (1988). Career preferences and career outcomes of Australian medical students. Medical Education. 22(3). 214–221. 9 indexed citations
18.
Shapiro, Margaret & Jake M. Najman. (1987). Socio-economic Status Differences in Patients' Desire For and Capacity to Obtain Information in the Clinical Encounter. Australian Journal of Social Issues. 22(2). 465–471. 5 indexed citations
19.
Shapiro, Margaret, Jake M. Najman, Anne B. Chang, et al.. (1983). Information control and the exercise of power in the obstetrical encounter. Social Science & Medicine. 17(3). 139–146. 58 indexed citations
20.
Asakura, Toshio, Kazuhiko Adachi, Margaret Shapiro, Shlomo Friedman, & Elias Schwartz. (1975). Mechanical precipitation of hemoglobin Köln. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure. 412(2). 197–201. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026