Margaret L. Meriwether
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Anthropology top 10%
- History top 10%
- Gender Studies
- Co-authors
- Leslie PeirceJudith E. TuckerSuraiya FaroqhiFatma Müge GöçekMervat HatemColin ImberDina Rizk Khoury
- Topics
- Islamic Studies and History (4 papers)Middle East Politics and Society (2 papers)Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (2 papers)
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewJournal of the American Oriental SocietyThe Middle East Journal
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Margaret L. Meriwether
4 papers receiving 98 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Political Science and International Relations 102
- Sociology and Political Science 87
- Anthropology 35
- History 26
- Gender Studies 12
Countries citing papers authored by Margaret L. Meriwether
This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret L. Meriwether's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret L. Meriwether with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret L. Meriwether more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret L. Meriwether
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret L. Meriwether. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret L. Meriwether. The network helps show where Margaret L. Meriwether may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret L. Meriwether
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret L. Meriwether. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret L. Meriwether based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret L. Meriwether. Margaret L. Meriwether is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | Women's Orients: English Women and the Middle East, 1718-1918. Sexuality, Religion and Work | 0 |
| 6 | The Imperial Harem: Women and Sovereignty in the Ottoman Empirebreakdown → | 122 |
| 7 | THE NOTABLE FAMILIES OF ALEPPO, 1770-1830: NETWORKS AND SOCIAL STRUCTURE | 0 |
About Margaret L. Meriwether
Margaret L. Meriwether is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Gender Studies and Anthropology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 159 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Islamic Studies and History (4 papers), Middle East Politics and Society (2 papers) and Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (102 citations), Anthropology (35 citations) and History (26 citations). Margaret L. Meriwether has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Leslie Peirce, Judith E. Tucker, Suraiya Faroqhi, Fatma Müge Göçek, Mervat Hatem, Colin Imber and Dina Rizk Khoury. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of the American Oriental Society and The Middle East Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.