The Middle East Journal

911 papers and 6.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 911 papers published in The Middle East Journal in the last decades have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations. Papers published in The Middle East Journal usually cover Sociology and Political Science (574 papers), Political Science and International Relations (497 papers) and Anthropology (71 papers) specifically the topics of Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (266 papers), Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (215 papers) and Politics of Islamic Reform in Middle East (213 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Middle East Journal are Nilüfer Göle, Mehran Kamrava, Ian S. Lustick, Joseph Massad, Oren Yiftachel, Mesut Yeğen, William A. Rugh, J. E. Peterson, Zahra Babar and Mamoun Fandy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Middle East Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Middle East Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Middle East Journal.

Countries where authors publish in The Middle East Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Middle East Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Middle East Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Middle East Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025