Margaret Forbes

1.2k citations
21 papers · 804 indexed · h-index 13

Margaret Forbes

21 papers receiving 765 citations

Peers

Margaret Forbes
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 607
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 303
  • Rehabilitation 82
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 164
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 81
Replace Gayle DeDe with:
Gayle DeDe United States
Carol Léonard Canada
Karin Zazo Ortiz Brazil
Christos Salis United Kingdom
Sarah Grace Dalton United States
Jacqueline Laures‐Gore United States
Margaret Lehman Blake United States
Claudia Peñaloza Spain
Laura Laird Canada
Jean Neils‐Strunjas United States
Margaret Forbes relative to Gayle DeDe United States Gayle DeDe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Gayle DeDe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Forbes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Forbes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Forbes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Forbes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret Forbes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Forbes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Forbes. The network helps show where Margaret Forbes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Margaret Forbes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Margaret Forbes Line = papers co-authored together Margaret Forbes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20252
2 20198
3 201918
4 20196
5 201825
6 201797
7 201646
8 201619
9
PWAs and PBJs: Language for describing a simple procedure
201312
10 201332
11 201236
12 2011287
13 20119
14 201058
15 199613
16
Response Variability in Naming: A Computational Study
19952
17 199345
18 199166
19
Beattie and His Friends
19905
20
The Evolution of Initial Global Aphasia: Implications for Prognosis
19856

About Margaret Forbes

Margaret Forbes is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Rehabilitation, having authored 21 papers that have together received 804 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (15 papers), Language Development and Disorders (6 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (2 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (2 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (607 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (303 citations) and Rehabilitation (82 citations). Margaret Forbes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Audrey L. Holland, Brian MacWhinney, Davida Fromm, Jessica D. Richardson, François Boller, Sarah Grace Dalton, Heather Harris Wright, Anna Basso, James T. Becker and Leanne Togher. Their work appears in journals such as Aphasiology, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Seminars in Speech and Language, Quantum Science and Technology and Cortex.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026